Micheli, Maria Elisa Antique Carved Gems: Items for Interaction between Ancient and Modern Art

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa177-5-48
Title Antique Carved Gems: Items for Interaction between Ancient and Modern Art
Author email maria.micheli@uniurb.it
About author Maria Elisa Micheli — full professor, head of department. Department of Humanities University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Palazzo Albani, Via del Balestriere, 2, 61019 Urbino (PU), Italy.
In the section Art of the Renaissance DOI10.18688/aa177-5-48
Year 2017 Volume 7 Pages 484–489
Type of article RAR Index UDK 7.032;7.034 Index BBK 85.123
Abstract

Engraved gems are the most remarkable repertoire of iconographic themes from antiquity. Their size allowed them to be carried everywhere in the ancient world and they were available for almost every situation in social life — an extraordinary means of expressing personal beliefs, as well as trends, religious, and political ideologies. The quality of a stone, its cutting-technique, and its subject are versatile performers illustrating the luxurious style of life of ancient societies. Gems have come haphazardly down to our days, sometimes reused into new objects or collected by wealthy amateurs: modern dactyliothecae reproduce the splendor of those in antiquity according the classical sources. Since the Renaissance and occasionally even earlier, in the Middle Ages, gems collecting acts as a metonym for legitimacy and authority. At the same time, gems stimulated philosophical discussions about their magical powers and, on the other hand, they were used by visual artist stimulating inventions for new figurative ideas. If it is difficult to recognize individual patterns deriving from antique carved gems, several prints by Enea Vico and Battista Franco show rich series of intaglios and cameos, creating an impressive ‘visual book’, from which artists could take inspiration. Starting from some subject reproduced by Vico and Franco around the mid-16th century, my paper aims to investigate the appropriation contexts of Dionysiac iconographies turned into convivial processions, triumphs, and allegorical convivial, thus followingthe guide-line provided by Phyllis Pray Bober and John Boardman. While taking into consideration various elements of interest, particular attention has been given to close connections with the concept of ‘firma facilitas’, an ancient-modern system balancing gratia, veritas, and diligentia. This, in turn, supports the arguments in favor of the importance of antique gems in modern visual art and of their artistic recoding.

 
Keywords
Reference Micheli, Maria Elisa. Antique Carved Gems: Items for Interaction between Ancient and Modern Art. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 7. Ed. S. V. Mal’tseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova, A. V. Zakharova. — St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Univ. Press, 2017, pp. 484–489. ISSN 2312-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa177-5-48
Publication Article language english
Bibliography
  • 1. Boardman J. Classical Gems and Media Interaction. Engraved gems. Survivals and Revivals (Studies in History of Art 32). C. M. Brown (ed.). Washington, University Press of New England Publ., 1997, pp. 13–21.
  • 2. Boardman J. A Pursuit of Art in Miniature. Apollo, 2008, February, pp. 56–71.
  • 3. Boardman J. The Triumph of Dionysos. Convivial Processions from Antiquity to the Present Day. Oxford, Archeopress Archaeology Publ., 2014. 78 p.
  • 4. Boardman J.; et al. The Beverley Collection of Gems at Alnwick Castle. London, Philip Wilson Publ., 2017. 320 p.
  • 5. Boschung D. Die Bildnisse des Augustus. Berlin, Mann Publ., 1993. 239 p. (in German).
  • 6. Brown C. M. (ed.). Engraved gems. Survivals and Revivals (Studies in History of Art 32). Washington, University Press of New England Publ., 1997. 320 p.
  • 7. Carey S. The Problem of Totality. Collecting Greek Art, Wonders and Luxury in Pliny the Elder’s Natural History. Journal of the History of Collections, 2000, vol. 12/1, pp. 1–13.
  • 8. Dacos N. La fortuna delle gemme medicee nel Rinascimento. Il Tesoro di Lorenzo il Magnifico. Le gemme. N. Dacos et al. (eds.). Firenze, Sansoni Editore Publ., 1972, pp. 133–156 (in Italian).
  • 9. De Paoli M. Vicinaque sidera fecit (Met. 2, 507). La stanza di Callisto a Palazzo Grimani, Venezia. Il gran poema delle passioni e delle meraviglie. Ovidio e il repertorio letterario e figurativo fra antico e riscoperta dell’antico (Antenor Quaderni 28). I. Colpo; F. Ghedini (eds.). Padova, Padova University Press, 2012, pp. 319–330 (in Italian).
  • 10. Favaretto I.; De Paoli M. I ‘camei di diverse sorte’ di Giovanni Grimani, patriarca di Aquileia. Intricate vicende di una collezione di gemme nella Venezia del XVI secolo. Aquileia e la glittica di età ellenistica e romana. G. Sena Chiesa; E. Gagetti (eds.). Trieste, Editreg Publ., 2009, pp. 261–280 (in Italian).
  • 11. Giuliano A. La glittica antica e le gemme di Lorenzo il Magnifico. Il Tesoro di Lorenzo il Magnifico. Le gemme. N. Dacos; et al. (eds.). Firenze, Sansoni Editore Publ., 1972, pp. 19–66 (in Italian).
  • 12. Kockel V.; Graepler A. (eds.). Daktyliotheken. Götter und Caesaren aus der Schublade. Antike Gemmen in Abdrucksammlungen des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts. München, Bierig-Brinkmann Publ., 2006. 216 p. (in German).
  • 13. Kosmetatou E. Poseidippos, ‘Epigr.’ 8 AB and Early Ptolemaic Cameos. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 2003, vol. 142, pp. 35–42.
  • 14. Knüppel H. C. Daktyliotheken: Konzepte einer historischen Publikations Form (Stendaler Winckelmann-Forschungen 8). Mainz, Franz Philipp Rutzen Publ., 2009. 196 p. (in German).
  • 15. Kuttner A. Cabinet Fit for a Queen: The Λιθικά as Posidippus’ Gem Museum. The New Posidippus. A Hellenistic Poetry Book. K. Gutzwiller (ed.). Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 141–163.
  • 16. La Monica D. Battista Franco, Enea Vico e le stampe dei cammei Grimani. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, 2014, serie 5, vol. 6/2, pp. 781–810, 887–903 (in Italian).
  • 17. La Monica D. Iconografie antiche o all’antica nella collezione glittica Grimani. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, 2015, serie 5, vol. 7/1, pp. 85–102 (in Italian).
  • 18. La Monica D. Antico e moderno nella collezione glittica Grimani. Rendiconti dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze morali, storiche, filologiche, 2016, serie 9, vol. 27/2, pp. 71–109 (in Italian).
  • 19. Lemburg-Ruppelt E. Die berühmte Gemma Mantovana und die Antikensammlung Grimani in Venedig. Xenia. Semestrale di Antichità, 1981, vol. 1, pp. 85–108 (in German).
  • 20. Lemburg-Ruppelt E. Zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Cameen-Sammlung Grimani: Gemeinsamkeiten mit dem Tesoro Lorenzo de‘ Medici. Rivista di Archeologia, 2002, vol. 26, pp. 86–114 (in German).
  • 21. Megow W. R. Zu einigen Kameen späthellenistischer und frühaugusteischer Zeit. Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, 1985, vol. 100, pp. 445–496 (in German).
  • 22. Micheli M. E. Gemmae Magicae. Platonismus und Esoterik in byzantinischem Mittelalter und italienischer Renaissance. Bibliotheca Chaldaica, vol. 3. H. Seng (ed.). Heidelberg, Universitätsverlag Winter Publ., 2013, pp. 175–194 (in Italian).
  • 23. Micheli M. E. Dactyliothecae romanae: tra publica magnificentia e privata luxuria. Rendiconti dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze morali, storiche, filologiche, 2016, serie 9, vol. 27/1, pp. 73–113 (in Italian).
  • 24. Neverov O. Gemme dalle collezioni Medici e Orsini. Prospettiva, 1982, vol. 29, pp. 2–13 (in Italian).
  • 25. Neverov O. La serie dei ‘Cammei e gemme antichi’ di Enea Vico e i suoi modelli. Prospettiva, 1984, vol. 37, pp. 22–32 (in Italian).
  • 26. Plantzos D. Hellenistic Cameos: Problems of Classification and Chronology. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 1996, vol. 41, pp. 115–131.
  • 27. Plantzos D. Hellenistic Engraved Gems. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1999. 148 p.
  • 28. Pray Bober Ph. Appropriation Contexts: Decor, Furor bacchicus, Convivium. Antiquiy and Its Interpreters. A. Payne; et al. (eds.). Cambridge Mass., Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 229–243.
  • 29. Sperti L. Temi ovidiani nella libreria sansoviniana a Venezia. Eidola. International Journal of Classical Art History, 2011, vol. 8, pp. 155–178 (in Italian).
  • 30. Thomas R. Hellenistische Wurzeln römischer Herrscherikonographie. Zur Alexanderangleichung des Augustus. Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, 1995, vol. 110, pp. 367–403 (in German).
  • 31. Vettori F. Dissertatio glyptographica sive Gemmae duae vetustissimae. Romae, Tipis Zempelianis Publ., 1739. 129 p. (in Latin).
  • 32. Vollenweider M. L. Die Steischneidekunst und ihre Künstler in spätrepublikanischer und augusteischer Zeit. Baden Baden, Bruno Grimm Publ., 1966. 148 p. (in German).
  • 33. Yuen T. Giulio Romano, Giovanni da Udine and Raphael: Some Influences from the Minor Arts of Antiquity. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 1979, vol. 42, pp. 263–272.
  • 34. Yuen T. Glyptic Sources of Renaissance Art. Engraved Gems. Survivals and Revivals (Studies in History of Art 32). C. M. Brown (ed.). Washington, University Press of New England, 1997, pp. 136–157.