Anna Freze Byzantine Octagon Domed Churches of the 11th Century and the Roman Imperial Architecture

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa155-2-28
Title Byzantine Octagon Domed Churches of the 11th Century and the Roman Imperial Architecture
Author email anna.freze@gmail.com
About author Freze, Anna Andreevna — PhD student. Saint Petersburg State University. 7/9, Universitetskaya nab., 199034 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
In the section Classical Legacy in the Art of Byzantine Oikoumene and Beyond DOI10.18688/aa155-2-28
Year 2015 Volume 5 Pages 277–286
Type of article RAR Index UDK 94 (495+47) “843/1204” : 726.7 Index BBK 85.11
Abstract

Summing up both the archaeological and textual evidence, it is possible to suggest that octagon domed churches did not appear out of nowhere. After the Iconoclasm era the centralized architectural designs were still the important loci for staging certain distinguished events of the imperial cult of both the living and the deceased emperors. So investigation of the Roman imperial mausolea and palatial aulae used for official ceremonies as the predecessors of the Byzantine architectural designs may yield some significant results. Renewed functioning of the complex of the Holy Apostles and the aulae of the Great Palace confirm that the centralized design and especially the octagonal one, were not only actual for the Byzantine architecture in the 9th–11th centuries, but this pattern was still able to convey a very special content, that of the idea of basilea as the sacral power and status of a Byzantine emperor.

Being a viable architectural pattern, the octagonal type may have been seen as a fruitful area for construction and design experiments, and the necessary impulse for them may have been provided by the building activity under Basil I, when his architects had to restore a significant number of the Early Byzantine edifices in Constantinople and its suburbs.

Thus, it may be suggested that the extant octagon domed churches of the 11th century, seen from this angle, may be considered as the result of blending the two types of design: cross-in-square church, being a symbol of monastic communities who were gathering strength, and octagonal church still closely linked to imperial/metropolitan commission. 
Keywords
Reference Anna Freze. Byzantine Octagon Domed Churches of the 11th Century and the Roman Imperial Architecture. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 5. Eds: Svetlana V. Maltseva, Ekaterina Yu. Stanyukovich-Denisova, Anna V. Zakharova. St. Petersburg, NP-Print Publ., 2015, pp. 277–286. ISSN 2312-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa155-2-28
Publication Article language english
Bibliography
  • Beliaev D. F. BYZANTINA. Ocherki, materialy i zametki po vizantiiskim drevnostiam. Kn. I. Obzor glavnykh chastei Bol’shogo Dvortsa vizantiiskikh tsarei (BYZANTINA. Essays, Materials and Notes on the Byzantine Antiquities. Vol. I. Overview of the Main Parts of the Great Palace of Byzantine Emperors). Saint Petersburg, Tipografiia Imperatorskoi Akademii Nauk Publ., 1891. 200 p. (in Russian).
  • Beliaev D.F. BYZANTINA. Ocherki, materialy i zametki po vizantiiskim drevnostiam. Kn. III. Bogomol’nye vykhody vizantiiskikh tsarei v gorodskie i prigorodnye khramy Konstantinopolia (BYZANTINA. Essays, Materials and Notes on the Byzantine Antiquities. Vol. III. Religious Processions of the Byzantine Emperors to the Urban and Suburban Churches of Constantinople). Saint Petersburg, Tipografiia I. N. Skorokhodova Publ., 1906. 189 p. (in Russian).
  • Berger A. (transl.). Accounts of Mediaeval Constantinople. The Patria. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library, no. 24. Cambridge, Mass — London, Harvard University Press Publ., 2013. 357 p.
  • Bouras Ch. Nea Moni on Chios. History and Architecture. Athens, Commercial Bank of Greece Publ., 1982. 208 p.
  • Ćurčić S. Architecture in the Balkans from Diocletian to Süleyman the Magnificent (ca. 300–ca. 1550). New Haven — London, Yale University Press Publ., 2010. 913 p.
  • Dagron G. Emperor and Priest. New York, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2003. 337 p.
  • Demangel R., Mamboury E. Le quartier des Manganes et la première region de Constantinople (Mangana Quarter and the First Region of Constantinople). Paris, de Boccard Publ., 1939. 212 p. (in French).
  • Featherstone M. J. All Saints and the Holy Apostles: De Cerimoniis II, 6–7. Nea Rome, 2009, vol. 6, pp. 235–248.
  • Featherstone M. J. The Chrysotriklinos seen through De Cerimoniis. Zwischen Polis, Provinz und Peripherie. Beiträge zur byzantinischen Geschichte und Kultur: Mainzer Veröffentlichungen zur Byzantinistik (Between Polis, Province and Periphery. Studies of Byzantine History and Culture). Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz Verlag Publ., 2005, vol. 7, pp. 845–852.
  • Grabar A. Martyrium. Recherches sur le culte des reliques et l`art chrétien antique. Vol. 2. Iconographie. Paris, Collège de France: fondation Schlumberger pour les études Byzantines Publ., 1946. 402 p. (in French).
  • Grierson Ph. The Tombs and Obits of the Byzantine Emperors (337–1042). Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 1962, vol. 16, pp. 3–63.
  • Janin R. Constantinople Byzantine. Développement urbaine et repertoire topographique. Archives de l`Orient chrétien, vol. 4. Paris, Institut français d`études byzantines Publ., 1950. 482 p. (in French).
  • Janin R. La Géographie ecclésiastique de l`Empire byzantine, I: Le siege de Constantinople et le patriarcat oecuménique, vol. 3: Les Eglises et les monastères. Paris, Institut français d`études byzantines Publ., 1969. 605 p. (in French).
  • Johnson M. J. The Roman Imperial Mausoleum in Late Antiquity. New York, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2009. 296 p.
  • Komech A. I. Drevnerusskoe zodchestvo kontsa X – nachala XII v. Vizantiiskoe nasledie i stanovlenie samostoiatel’noi traditsii (Old Russian Architecture in the Late Ninth — Early Twelfth Centuries. Byzantine Legacy and the Emergence of Separate Tradition). Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987. 319 p. (in Russian).
  • Krautheimer R. Early Christian and Byzantine Architecture. New Haven — London, Yale University Press Publ., 1986. 553 p.
  • Krautheimer R. Introduction to an “Iconography of Mediaeval Architecture”. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 1942, vol. 5, pp. 1–33.
  • Lavin I. The House of the Lord: Aspects of the Role of Palace Triclinia in the Architecture of Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Art Bulletin, 1962, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–27.
  • Liubarskii Ia. N. (transl.). Psell Mikhail. Khronografiia. (Chronographia). Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978. 320 p. (in Russian).
  • Liubarskii Ia. N. (ed.). Prodolzhatel’ Feofana. Zhizneopisaniia vizantiiskikh tsarei. Vizantiiskaia biblioteka. Istochniki. (Theophanes Continuatus. Lives of the Byzantine Emperors). Saint Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ., 2009. 400 p. (in Russian).
  • MacDonald W. L. The Architecture of the Roman Empire. Vol. I: An Introductory Study. Yale Publications in the History of Art, vol. 17. New Haven — London, Yale University Press Publ., 1982. 225 p.
  • Mango C. Byzantine Architecture. History of World Architecture. New York, Abrams Publ., 1976. 383 p.
  • Mango C. Constantine’s Mausoleum and the Translation of Relics. Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 1990, vol. 83, pp. 51–62.
  • Mango C. The Art of the Byzantine Empire, 312–1453: Sources and Documents. Medieval Academy Reprints for Teaching, vol. 16. Toronto — Buffalo — London, University of Toronto Press Publ., 2009. 272 p.
  • Mathews Th. F. The Early Churches of Constantinople: Architecture and Liturgy. University Park and London, Pennsylvania State University Press Publ., 1971. 194 p.
  • Mathews Th. F.; Mango C. Observations on the Church of Panagia Kamariotissa on Heybeliada (Chalke), Istanbul, with a Note on Panagia Kamariotissa and Some Imperial Foundations of the Tenth and Eleventh Centuries at Constantinople. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 1973, vol. 27, pp. 115–132.
  • Ousterhout R. Originality in Byzantine Architecture: The Case of Nea Moni. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 1992, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 48–60.
  • Ousterhout R. Rebuilding the Temple: Constantine Monomachus and the Holy Sepulchre. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 1989, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 66–78.
  • Vocotopoulos P. L. The Role of Constantinopolitan Architecture during the Middle and Late Byzantine Period. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantininstik, 1981, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 551–573.
  • Ward-Perkins J. B. Imperial Mausolea and Their Possible Influence on Early Christian Central-Plan Buildings. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 1966, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 297–299.
  • Ward-Perkins J. B. Roman Imperial Architecture. Pelican History of Art. New Haven — London, Yale University Press Publ., 1994. 532 p.