Title Spirit and Form: Heinrich Wölfflin on Italian Renaissance Portraiture
Author email vzaharova@eu.spb.ru
About author Zakharova, Vera N. — Ph.D. student, European University at St. Petersburg. 3a Gagarinskaya str., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191187.
In the section Western Art from the Middle Ages to the 20th Century
Year 2014 Volume 4 Pages 238252
Type of article RAR Index UDK 7.034(450) Index BBK 85.14
Abstract

The article is dedicated to the issues of interpretation of the Italian Renaissance portraiture in the works of Heinrich Wölfflin “Classic Art” (1899) and “Italy and the German sense of Form” (1931).
The article deals with the category of “corporeal”, which was established in the early works of the scholar (“Prolegomena to a Psychology of Architecture” and “Renaissance and Baroque”) and played a crucial role in the shaping of Wölfflin’s position on the Italian Renaissance portrait and on the Italian Renaissance art in general. The author proves that a concept of the “corporeal” and its manifestations (posture, motion and gesticulation) appear like a world-view or a “spirit of the age” expression and condition some fundamental differences in approach towards the form in the Early and High Renaissance periods. Secular as well as reli-gious paintings of that time in the works of Wölfflin appear like a transformed world-view reflection; they are connected with transition from one social class (bourgeoisie) to another (aristocracy), and therefore, with a process of a “type idealization”, which spread in Italian painting in the beginning of the 16th c. According to the author of the paper, ideas of the interrelation between artistic ideal and human body, as well as the con-cept of moral qualities reflection in human appearance, which were developed in Wölfflin’s “Classic Art” and “Italy and the German sense of Form”, go back to Johann Joachim Winckelmann and to physiognomy of the 18th c. (first of all to the works of Johann Caspar Lavater). Wölfflin’s passages on “nobleness”, “majesty” and “lucidity” of the Cinquecento works of art actually develop Winckelmann’s famous theory of “noble simplic-ity and quiet grandeur” in the Ancient Greek works of the High Classical period. Thereby, the art of Cinque-cento acquires a particular significance: it represents order as opposed to chaos, personifying the aristocratic ideal.
 

Keywords
Reference Zakharova, Vera N. Spirit and Form: Heinrich Wölfflin on Italian Renaissance Portraiture. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 4. Eds: Svetlana V. Maltseva, Anna V. Zakharova. St. Petersburg, NP-Print Publ., 2014, pp. 238–252. ISSN 2312-2129.
Publication Article language russian
Bibliography
  • Ackerman J. Toward a New Social Theory of Art. New Literary History, 1973, no. 4, pp. 315–330.
  • Arslanov V.G. Western art history of the 20th century. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt, Traditsiia, 2005. 864 p. (in Russian).
  • Freedman L. The Counter-portrait: the Quest for the Ideal in Italian Renaissance Portraiture. Il Ritratto e la memoria. Materiali 3. Gentili A. ed. Rome, Bulzoni, 1993, pp. 63–81.
  • Gombrich E.H. In Search of Cultural History. Gombrich E.H. Ideals and Idols: Essays on Values in History and in Art. Oxford, Phaidon Press, 1979, pp. 24–59.
  • Gombrich E.H. Norm and Form: The Stylistic Categories of Art History and Their Origins in Renaissance Ideals. Gombrich E.H. Norm and Form. Studies in the Art of the Renaissance. Vol. 1. London, New York, Phaidon Press, 1978, pp. 81–98.
  • Hart J. Reinterpreting Wölfflin: Neo-Kantianism and Hermeneutics. The Crisis in the Discipline. Art Journal, 1982, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 292–300.
  • Hauser A. The Philosophical Implication of Art History: «Art History Without Names». Hauser A. The Philosophy of Art History. New York, Knopf, 1959, pp. 119–276.
  • Hegel G.W.F. Aesthetics. Vol. 1. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1968. 312 p. (Russian translation).
  • Hegel G.W.F. Aesthetics. Vol. 3. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1971. 624 p. (Russian translation).
  • Iversen M. Politics and the Historiography of Art History: Wölfflin’s «Classic Art». Oxford Art Journal, 1981, vol. 4, no. 1. pp. 31–34.
  • Maginnis H.B.J. Reflections on Formalism: The Post-Impressionists and the Early Italians. Art History, 1996, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 191–207.
  • Mosse G.L. The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, 1998. 232 p.
  • Panofsky E. Gothic architecture and scholasticism. Panofsky E. Perspective as «symbolic form». Gothic ar-chitecture and scholasticism. Saint-Petersburg, Azbuka-klassika, 2004, pp. 213–325 (Russian translation).
  • Pater W. The Renaissance. Studies in art and poetry. Moscow, Izdatel’skii dom Mezhdunarodnogo univer-siteta v Moskve, 2006. 351 p. (Russian translation).
  • Sokolov M.N. Time and place. Art of Renaissance as a first frontier of virtual space. Moscow, Pro-gress-Traditsiia, 2003. 384 p. (in Russian).
  • Warnke M. On Heinrich Wölfflin. Representations, 1989, no. 27, pp. 172–187.
  • Winckelmann J.J. History of the art of Antiquity. Minor works. Saint-Petersburg, Alteiia, 2000. 800 p. (Rus-sian translation).
  • Wölfflin H. Art of Italy and Germany of the Renaissance. Leningrad, Ogiz, 1934. 388 p. (Russian translation).
  • Wölfflin H. Classic art. An introduction to the Italian Renaissance. Moscow, Airis-press, 2004. 368 p. (Rus-sian translation).
  • Wölfflin H. Principles of art history: the problem of the development of style in later art. Moscow, V. Shevchuk, 2009. 344 p. (Russian translation).
  • Wölfflin H. Renaissance and Baroque. Saint-Petersburg, Griadushchii den’, 1913. 164 p. (Russian transla-tion).
  • Wölfflin H. Renaissance and Baroque. An investigation into the nature and origin of the Baroque style in It-aly. Saint-Petersburg, Azbuka-klassika, 2004. 284 p. (Russian translation).