Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa2414-7-40
Title Thaw and Armenian Painting: Рages of Art Criticism of the 1950s
Author email lilit.sargsyan1@edu.isec.am
About author Sargsyan, Lilit H. — Ph.D. student. Institute of Arts of National Academy of Sciences of Republic of Armenia. 24g, Marshal Baghramyan ave., 0019 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia; instart@sci.am, lilit.sargsyan1@edu.isec.am; ORCID: 0009-0004-4586-2242; Scopus ID: 58804218000.
In the section International Art in the 20th and 21st Centuries DOI10.18688/aa2414-7-40
Year 0 Volume 14 Pages 510521
Type of article RAR Index UDK 7.011.3 Index BBK 85.103(2) (5Арм)
Abstract

The article is the first to examine the significance and characteristics of the Khrushchev Thaw transformations in Armenian painting. The main source material is derived from the press of the period under investigation. The author draws attention to the formation of a new conjuncture in Soviet painting and art criticism during the 1950s, which corresponded to the Khrushchev’s reforms and their associated propaganda, as well as the opposition of Armenian artists to this conjuncture. A special attention is paid to totalitarian methods of art management and their criticism, which became possible as a result of the reforms, the general directions of art democratization, as well as the national policy regarding the art of Soviet peoples. The article is based on the analysis of a large-scale exhibition of Armenian fine art, held in June 1956 in Moscow as a part of the Decade of Armenian art and literature and, in particular, two eminent Thaw paintings which became the revelation of the exhibition: “Spring” by Hovhannes Zardaryan and “Komitas. Last night” by Sargis Muradyan. By their example, the author identifies two main directions in the renewal of Armenian painting of the Thaw period as purely artistic and thematic. The author comes to the conclusion that after the Stalinist restrictions, the revival of Armenian Soviet painting of the second half of the 20th century was not so much a direct consequence of the Thaw, but rather the continuation of its pre-revolutionary national and European artistic traditions.

Keywords
Reference Sargsyan, Lilit H. Thaw and Armenian Painting: Рages of Art Criticism of the 1950s. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 14. Eds A. V. Zakharova, S. V. Maltseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova. — Lomonosov Moscow State University / St. Petersburg: NP-Print, 2024, pp. 510–521. ISSN 2312-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa2414-7-40
Publication Article language russian
Bibliography
  • Aghasyan A. Hay kerparvesti zargatsman ughinery XIX–XX darerum (1828–1991) (Ways of Development of Armenian Art in 19th–20th Centuries (1828–1991)). Yerevan, Voskan Yerevantsi Publ., 2009. 292 p. (in Armenian).
  • Aksiutin Yu.; Volobuev O. ХХ syezd KPSS. Novatsii i dogmy (The 20th Congress of the CPSU. Innovations and Dogmas). Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1991. 224 p. (in Russian).
  • Anonym. Genre Diversity — A Necessary Requirement. From the Materials of the Discussion of the Works of Armenian Artists. Sovetakan arvest (Soviet Art), 1956, no. 7–8, pp. 52–55 (in Armenian).
  • Bobrikov A. Severe Style: Mobilization and Cultural Revolution. Moscow Art Magazine, Moscow, 2003, no. 51–52, pp. 29–33 (in Russian).
  • Boym S. Obschie mesta. Mifologiia povsednevnoi zhizni (Common Places. Mythology of Everyday Life). Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2002. (in Russian).
  • Gayfedjyan E.; Kurtsens I. (eds). Armianskaia zhivopis’ novogo i noveishego vremeni. Osnovnye tendentsii razvitiia (The Armenian Painting of New and Modern Times. The Main Trends of Development). Yerevan, Soyuzreklamkultura Publ., 1990. 55 p. (in Russian).
  • Hovhannissian R. The Plot on the Canvas. Sovetakan arvest (Soviet Art), 1956, no. 6, pp. 24–28 (in Armenian).
  • Isahakyan A. Bon Voyage. Sovetakan arvest (Soviet Art), 1956, no. 5, pp. 3–4 (in Armenian)
  • Khruschev N. For the Close Connection of Literature and Art with the Life of the People, Iskusstvo (Art), 1957, no. 5, pp. 3–13 (in Russian).
  • Kurlyandtseva A.; Vorotyntseva Yu. (compl.); Karpova T. (ed.), Ottepel’ (The Thaw: exhibition at State Tretyakov Gallery on Krymsky Val, 14.02.–11.06.2017). Moscow, State Tretyakov Gallery Publ., 2017. (in Russian).
  • Nersisian A. Chelovek i priroda. Armianskaia zhivopis’ vtoroi poloviny dvadtsatogo veka (Human and Nature. Armenian Painting of the Second Half of the 20th Century). Yerevan Gasprint Publ., 2004. 261 p. (in Russian).
  • Parsamyan R. (ed.). Vistavka izobrazitelnogo iskusstva Armyanskoi SSR. Zhivopis’, skulptura, grafika, dekoratsionnaia zhivopis, prikladnye iskusstva. Dekada armianskogo iskusstva i literatury (Exhibition of Fine Art of the Armenian SSR. Painting, Sculpture, Graphics, Decorative Painting, Applied Art. Decade of Armenian Art and Literature: Catalogue). Moscow, Ministry of Culture of USSR, Ministry of Culture of Soviet Armenia, Union of Painters of USSR, Union of Painters of Soviet Armenia Publ., 1956. 118 p. (in Russian and in Armenian).
  • Salnikov V. In the 60’s in the USSR. Moscow Art Magazine, 2003, no. 51–52. (in Russian).
  • Sargsyan L. The Importance of Impressionism in the 20th Century Armenian Painting: Traditions and Innovations. Armenian Impressionism. From Moscow to Paris. Catalogue of the Exhibition. Moscow, Museum of Russian Impressionism Publ., 2017, pp. 28–35 (in Russian).
  • Sargsyan L. Between the Political and the Aesthetic. Armenian Painting in the Context of “Thaw”. Antonyan J. (ed.). Khorhrdahay mshakuyty. Kontsepty, ynkalumnery ev drsevorumnery (Soviet Armenian Culture. Concept, Perceptions and Manifestacions. Digest of articles). Yerevan, Yerevan State University Publ., 2023. (in Armenian).
  • Sopotsinsky O. Revealing the Feelings of a Contemporary. Tvorchestvo (Creativity), 1958, no. 6, pp. 17–19 (in Russian).
  • Stepanyan N. The Origins of Trends in Armenian Painting of Our Days. Armyanskoe sovestskoe iskusstvo na sovremennom etape (Armenian Soviet Art at the Present Stage). Yerevan, Academy of Sciences of Armenian SSR Publ., 1987, pp. 84–103 (in Russian).
  • Stepanyan N. Iskusstvo Rossii dvadtsatogo veka. Vzgliad iz 90-kh (Art of Russia of the 20th Century. A View from the 90s), Moscow, Eksmo-press Publ.1999. 416 p. (in Russian).
  • The Fifth Conference of Armenian Artists. Sovetakan arvest (Soviet Art), 1956, no. 11, pp. 48–49 (in Armenian).
  • Vagharshyan V. Bright Goals. Sovetakan arvest (Soviet Art), 1956, no. 3, pp. 3–4 (in Armenian).
  • Vayl P.; Genis Al. Intervention. Inostrannaia literatura (Foreign Literature), 1991, no. 2, pp. 236–254 (in Russian).
  • Virabyan A. Hayastany Stalinits minchev Khrushchov: Hasarakakan-qaghaqakan kyanqy (1945–1957 թթ.) (Armenia from Stalin to Khrushchev. Social and Political Life (1945–1957)), Yerevan, 2001. (in Armenian).
  • Yoganson B. The Image is the Crown of Painting. From the Report on the Works of Armenian Artists. Sovetakan arvest (Soviet Art), 1956, no. 7–8, pp. 35–43 (in Armenian).
  • Zardaryan H. Following the Example of the Masters, Sovetakan arvest (Soviet Art), 1956, no. 5, p. 18 (in Armenian).