Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa2414-4-26
Title “Onions for those who are tired of capons”: Rivalry in the Roman Artistic World after Raphael’s Death
Author email mashadunina@mail.ru
About author Lubnikova, Maria V. — Ph. D., researcher, curator. The Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, Volkhonka, 12, 119019 Moscow, Russian Federation; SPIN-code: 7565-2254; ORCID: 0000-0003-0220-9310; Scopus ID: 57204188024
In the section Art of the Renaissance DOI10.18688/aa2414-4-26
Year 0 Volume 14 Pages 337344
Type of article RAR Index UDK 7.034(450)5 Index BBK 85.143(3)
Abstract

Michelangelo’s alliance with Sebastiano del Piombo, concluded with the intention of surpassing Raphael and winning commissions from the heirs of his workshop, is one of the most vivid examples of the bitter artistic rivalry that prevailed in Rome in the 1520s. Michelangelo, at the request of Sebastiano, wrote to Pope Leo X, urging him to “change his diet” and to give preference to any other workshop than Santi’s. But the attempts to attract the attention of the customer were unsuccessful. The patrons were aware that it was the great Buonarroti who sponsored some of the masters with his sketches in order to compete with the heirs of Raphael without personally entering the Roman artistic scene. However, neither Sebastiano, nicknamed by Pietro Aretino “the spear of Michelangelo”, nor anyone else was able to get a significant creative commission at the Vatican during this period. This article highlights a number of reasons why many talented painters were unable to secure their positions at the papal court in the 1520s and compete fiercely among themselves. In addition to the success of the team of former Raphael’s assistants, and historical events that led to the sharp impoverishment of Rome, the chances of Michelangelo and Sebastiano for obtaining commissions were significantly constrained by the psychology of the artists-conspirators themselves.

Keywords
Reference Lubnikova, Maria V. “Onions for those who are tired of capons”: Rivalry in the Roman Artistic World after Raphael’s Death. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 14. Eds A. V. Zakharova, S. V. Maltseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova. — Lomonosov Moscow State University / St. Petersburg: NP-Print, 2024, pp. 337–344. ISSN 2312-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa2414-4-26
Publication Article language russian
Bibliography
  • Barbieri C. The Competition between Raphael and Michelangelo and Sebastiano’s Role in It. The Cambridge Companion to Raphael. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2005, pp. 141–164.
  • Barocchi P.; Ristori R. (eds). Il Carteggio di Michelangelo. Florence, Sansoni Publ., 1965–1983. 5 vols. (in Italian).
  • Barolsky P. Michelangelo’s Nose: A Myth and its Maker. University Park, PA, Penn State Press Publ., 1990. 166 p.
  • Buonarroti M. Rime e Lettere. Turin, Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese Publ., 1992. 698 p. (in Italian).
  • Burke J. The One about Michelangelo and the Onions: Jokes and Cultural Anxiety in the Early Sixteenth Century. Studies on Florence and the Italian Renaissance in Honour of F. W. Kent. Turnhout, Brepols Publ., 2016, pp. 495–516.
  • Cornini G. The Master and the Workshop. The Frescoes in the Sala di Costantino in the Light of the Recent Restoration. Raphael 1520–1483: Catalogue. Milan, Skira editore Publ., 2020, pp. 269–282.
  • Dolce L. Dialogo della pittura. L’Aretino. Dolce’s “Aretino” and Venetian Art Theory of the Cinquecento. New York, New York University Press Publ., 1968, pp. 83–195.
  • Dunina M. V. Specialization in Raphael’s Roman Workshop. Distribution of Tasks and Collaboration of Talents. Iskisstvoznanie (Art Studies), 2018, no. 3, pp. 50–73 (in Russian).
  • Dunina M. V. Michelangelo-Educator: Creative Individuality and Teaching Method. Zakharova A. V.; Maltseva S. V.; Staniukovich-Denisova E. Iu. (eds). Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of Articles, vol. 9. Lomonosov Moscow State University; St. Petersburg, NP-Print Publ., 2019, pp. 634–643 DOI: 10.18688/aa199-5-57 (in Russian).
  • Dunina M. V. Temporary Artistic Co-Operations and Painting Workshops in Rome of the Second Half of the 16th Century. Klio (Clio), 2019, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 105–109 (in Russian).
  • Goffen R. Renaissance Rivals: Michelangelo, Leonardo, Raphael and Titian. New Haven, London, Yale University Press Publ., 2002. 521 p.
  • Shearman J. Raphael in Early Modern Sources. New Haven, Yale University Press Publ., 2003. 2 vols.
  • Vasari G. Le vite de’piu eccelenti pittori, scultori ed architettori, 9 vols. Florence, Sansoni Publ., 1878–1885 (in Italian).
  • Wallace W. E. Michelangelo’s Assistants in the Sistine Chapel. Gazette des Beaux Arts, 1987, nο. 110, pp. 203–216.
  • Wallace W. E. Michelangelo: The Artist, the Man, and His Times. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2010. 424 p.
  • Wolk-Simon L. Competition, Collaboration, and Specialization in the Roman Art World, 1520–27. The Pontificate of Clement VII: History, Politics, Culture. Aldershot, Ashgate Publ., 2005, pp. 253–74.