Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa2313-1-7
Title Amazonomachy in the Mausoleum of Chersonesos Taurica: On the Historical and Mythological in Early-Hellenistic Art
Author email aa-trofimova@yandex.ru
About author Trofimova, Anna A. — Ph. D., the head of the Department of Classical Antiquities. The State Hermitage Museum, Dvortsovaia nab., 34, 199000 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; SPIN-code: 9632-2786;ORCID: 0000-0003-1614-9224
In the section Art of the Ancient World DOI10.18688/aa2313-1-7
Year 2023 Volume 13 Pages 7688
Type of article RAR Index UDK 7.032 Index BBK 63.3(0)32; 85.133(3)
Abstract

During the excavations in the southern suburb of Tauric Chersonesos, a mausoleum of a deified citizen of Chersonesos was discovered. This monument is unique for the Northern Black Sea region. The upper closed part of the building contained a sarcophagus with the remains of the hero. There was a temple-like structure on the top. A stone block with a relief depicting a scene of Amazonomachy was found on the territory of the heroon. The fragment belonged to the frieze located on the podium of naiskos. A close analogy to the iconography of that scene is presented on a sarcophagus found in Cyprus (now in the Vienna Kunsthistorisches Museum). The source of the iconography of battles between the Amazons and the Greeks, which became popular in the 4th century B.C., came from the friezes that decorated the architectural structures of the herons of Lycia and Caria. Under the influence of oriental samples, in the second half of the 4th century B.C., the subjects of the Amazonomachy appeared in the art of different regions in reliefs, mainly of funerary context. A striking example of such an influence in Attica can be considered the naiskos in Kallithea (now in the Archaeological Museum of Piraeus). Another parallel to the Chersonese discovery are the monuments found on Via Umbria in Tarentum. The Chersonese relief dates from 350 to 300 B.C., for which there are iconographic and stylistic grounds. When compared with the samples of the middle of the 4th century B.C., the iconography of the scene coincides in detail. The low relief features casually moving figures, and the ‘heroic diagonal’ is clearly read in the composition, which is the main artistic technique of Scopas used in the reliefs of the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus. The connection between the Amazonomachy and funeral naiskos can be traced throughout the second half of the 4th century B.C. The theme was used in the decoration of small funerary temples and sarcophagi in Southern Italy, Cyprus, and the Northern Black Sea region. The story of the battle with the Amazons, placed on the funeral structures in the cities of the ancient periphery, served as a universal way to give a heroic status to the representatives of the local elite. Although the images of Amazons were extremely popular on the Bosporus, the subjects of battles between the Greeks an Amazons were extremely rare in art of Chersonese. In the scene of the battle from the mausoleum, the details of the actual military ammunition of a warrior point to the real, not mythological character — the owner of the tomb. During this period the combination of the historical and the mythological can been found in many monuments, such as the Alexander Sarcophagus from Sidon, the sarcophagus from Soli, the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, and the monument at Kallithea. Mythical personages and historical figures encounter each other in battles in the unified space of the funerary monument.

Keywords
Reference Trofimova, Anna A. Amazonomachy in the Mausoleum of Chersonesos Taurica: On the Historical and Mythological in Early-Hellenistic Art. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 13. Eds A. V. Zakharova, S. V. Maltseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova. — Lomonosov Moscow State University / St. Petersburg: NP-Print, 2023, pp. 76–88. ISSN 2312-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa2313-1-7
Publication Article language russian
Bibliography
  • Belli Pasqua R. Taranto: la scultura in marmo e in pietra. Catalogo del Museo Archaeologico Nazionale di Taranto, vol. IV.1. Taranto, 1995, pp. 1–8 (in Italian).
  • Belli Pasqua R. Architettura funeraria a Rodi in età ellenistica: documentazione locale e forme di contatto. Bollettino di Archeologia on line, 2010, vol. speciale CC–7–4, p. 51 (in Italian).
  • Bujskih A. About Some Little-Known Types of Burial Structures of the Necropolis of Chersonese Taurica in 4th –3rd Centuries BC. Prichernomor’e, Krym, Rus’ v istorii i culture. Materialy II Sudakskoi konferentsii (Black See Pontic Area, Crimea, Russia in the History and Culture). Kiev; Sudak, 2004, pp. 20–26 (in Russian).
  • Carter J. The Sculpture of Taras. Philadelphia, 1975. 196 p.
  • Fialko E. Scythian Amazons Took Part in the Military Conflicts. Proceedings of the State Hermitage Museum, vol. 75, 2015, pp. 440–456 (in Russian).
  • Fleischer R. Der Wiener Amazonensarkophag. Antike Plastik, 1998, iss. 26, pp. 7–54, pl. 1–18 (in German).
  • Gschwantler K. Sarcophagus with Fighting Amazons. Gschwantler K.; Bernhard-Walcher A.; Laubenberger M.; Plattner G.; Zhuber-Okrog K. (eds). Masterpieces in the Collection of Greek and Roman Antiquities. A Brief Guide to the Kunsthistorisches Museum 4. Vienna, 2012, pp. 56–57.
  • Hagemajer A. Becoming the ‘Other’: Attitudes and Practices at Attic Cemeteries. Dougherty C.; Kurke L. (eds). The Cultures within Ancient Greek Culture: Contact, Conflict, Collaboration. Cambridge, 2003, pp. 207–236.
  • Hölscher T. Krieg und Kunst im antiken Griechenland und Rom. Münchner Vorlesungen zu Antiken Welten Herausgegeben vom Münchner Zentrum für Antike Welten, vol. 4. Berlin, 2019. 373 p. (in German).
  • Ivantchik A. Amazonen, Skythen und Sauromaten: Alte und moderne Mythen. Schubert Ch.; Weiss A. (eds). Amazonen zwischen Griechen und Skythen. Beiträge zum Altertumskunde, iss. 310. Berlin, 2013, pp. 73–82 (in German).
  • Juliis E. de. Taranto. Bari, 2000. 158 p.
  • Kaltsas N. Sculpture in the National Archaeological Museum. Athens, 2002. 375 p.
  • Langner M. Amazonen auf Kertscher Vasen. Wechselnde Blickwinkel auf ein populäres Bildmotiv. Amazonen zwischen Griechen und Skythen. Gegenbilder in Mythos und Geschichte, Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 310. Berlin, 2013, pp. 221–257 (in German).
  • Lippolis E. Arte e artigianato in Magna Grecia. Napoli, 1996. 541 p. (in Italian).
  • Lippolis E. Tipologie e significati del monumento funerarionella cità ellenistica. Lo sviluppo del naiskos. Architetti, architettura e cità nel Mediterraneo orientale ellenistico. Atti del Convegno, Venezia (10–11 giugno 2005). Milano, 2007, pp. 82–102 (in Italian).
  • Palagia O. Commemorating the Dead: Grave Markers, Tombs, and Tomb Paintings, 400–30 BCE. Miles M. (ed.). A Companion to Greek Architecture. Oxford, Wiley & Sons, 2016, pp. 374–389.
  • Petrakova А.; Jaggi О. Amazons on the Attic Red-figure Vases Found on the Northern Black Sea Pontic Area. Bosporan studies, 2016, iss. 17, pp. 356–366 (in Russian).
  • Picón C. Sculptural Styles of Magna Graecia. Bennett M., Paul A.; Iozzo M. (eds). Magna Graecia: Greek Art from South Italy and Sicily, The Cleveland Museum of Art. New York and Manchester, Hudson Hills Publ., 2002, pp. 68–81.
  • Plattner G. The Amazon Sarcophagus from Soloi in Vienna. Summer L.; Kaba H. (eds). The Northern Face of Cyprus. İstanbul, 2016, pp. 177–191.
  • Ridgway B.S. Hellenistic Sculpture I, 331–200 BC. Madison, 1990. 464 p.
  • Riedemann V. The Amazonomachy on Attic and Tarantine Funerary Naiskoi. Athens Journal of History. July 2018, pp. 149–173.
  • Saprykin S. Relief from the Excavation of the Ancient Theatre in Chersonesos. Chersonesskii sbornik (Proceedings of the Chersonesos Museum), vol. 20, 2019, pp. 175–193 (in Russian).
  • Savostina Е. (ed.). Bosporskii relief so stsenoi srazheniia (amazonomakhiia?) (Bosporan Battle Relief (Amazonomachia?)). Мoscow; St. Petersburg, 2001. 331 p. (in Russian).
  • Schiering W. Zum Amazonenfries des Maussoleums in Halikarnass. Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archaologischen Instituts, 1975, vol. 90, pp. 132–133 (in German).
  • Shaub I. Mif, kult, ritual v Severnom Prichernomoeje VII– IV vv. do n.e. (Myth, Cult, Ritual in the North Black Sea Area). St. Petersburg, 2007. 484 p. (in Russian).
  • Skrzinskaya М. Women in Religion and Rituals in Bosporan Kingdom (5th —3rd cc. BC). Zuev V. (ed.). The Bosporan Phenomenon (Bosporskii phenomen. Sakralmyi smysl regiona, pamatnikov, nahodok). St. Petersburg, The State Hermitage Museum Publ., 2007, pp. 22–26 (in Russian).
  • Solovieva S. (ed.). Sokrovischa Iuzgnogo prigoroda Chersonesa Tavricheskogo (Treasure of the Southern Suburbs of the Chersonesos Taurica). Sevastopol, GIA MZ Chersones Tavricheskii, 2022. 36 p. (in Russian).
  • Steinhauer G. The Archaeological Museum of Piraeus. Athens, Latsis Group Publ., 2001. 408 p.
  • Stewart A. Faces of Power. Alexander’s Image and Hellenistic Politics. Berkley, Los Angeles, Oxford, University of California Press Publ., 1993. 507 p.
  • Treister M. The Theme of Amazonomahy in the Late Classical and Early Hellenistic Toreutic. Savostina E. (ed.). Bosporskii relief so stsenoi srazheniia (amazonomakhiia?) (Bosporan Battle Relief (Amazonomachia?)). Мoscow; St. Petersburg, 2001, pp. 243–284 (in Russian).
  • Trofimova A. Relief from Chersonesos Taurica with the Scene of Amazonomachy. Zaikov A. (ed.). Istoria i archeologia Severnogo Prichermomoria v antichnuiu epokhu : Vserossiiskaia nauchnaia konferentsia “Chersones Tavricheskii” (Sevastopol, 25–29.09.2022) (Proceeding of the Conference “Chersonesos Taurica”). Simferopol, 2022, pp. 188–193 (in Russian).
  • Tugusheva О. Scene of Amsazonomachy on the Bosporan pelicae. Savostina E. (ed.) Bosporskii relief so stsenoi srazheniia (amazonomakhiia?) (Bosporan Battle Relief (Amazonomachia?)). Мoscow; St. Petersburg, 2001, pp. 216–229 (in Russian).
  • Waywell G. B. The Free-standing Sculpture of the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus in the British Museum, London. London, The British Museum Publications, 1978. 318 p.
  • Zubar V.; Buiskih A.; Kravchenko E.; Marchenko L; Rusiaeva A. Chersones Tavricheskii v tretiei chetverti VI – seredine I v. do n.e.: Ocherki istorii i kultury (Chersonesos Taurica in the Third Quarter of the 6th – mid 3rd Century BC). Kiev, 2005. 623 p. (in Russian).