Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa2212-03-16
Title Monarch’s Costume as the Means of Representation of Unity with the Population in Europe in the 17th — Early 19th Century
Author email e.skvortsova@spbu.ru
About author Skvortcova, Ekaterina A. — Ph. D., associate professor. Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaia nab., 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. ORCID: 0000-0003-4867-5915
In the section European Art in the Modern Times DOI10.18688/aa2212-03-16
Year 2022 Volume 12 Pages 236246
Type of article RAR Index UDK 75.03 Index BBK 85.103
Abstract

The paper examines practice of dressing a monarch of foreign dynasty in a local costume. It was characteristic mainly of composite monarchies, but also of the states not included in such formations in case rulers came from a foreign dynasty. Russian art history did not address such a problem. In European costume studies, there has been no comprehensive work summarizing the existing conclusions concerning traditions of particular countries. The present paper partly fills this gap and sheds light on common mechanisms and nuances in differences on the example of the kingdom of Hungary as a part of Habsburg Monarchy, the kingdom of Poland as a part of personal union with Electorate of Saxony, kingdom of Scotland as a part of Great Britain, and Spain under the Bourbon dynasty.

In each case, the costume and the practice had certain specifics: this could be the dress of the elite principally different from that of other population (Poland), or the dress of the elite similar in its cut and décor to that of other population (Hungary), or the dress of the lower classes adopted by the elite (Spain), or the dress of the lower classes not used by them from certain moment and borrowed by the elite (Scotland). However, this is always the dress associated with identity, having long history, true or invented, and still worn by the elite at the moment. The practice was conveyed in various media. One of the most important among them is a ceremonial portrait. Its rhetoric corresponds to publicity of the very act of wearing such a dress which was usually used for coronation (Poland, Hungary) or during significant festivities (Scotland).

The reported study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, project number 21-78-00067 URL: https://rscf.ru/project/21-78-00067/.

Keywords
Reference Skvortcova, Ekaterina A. Monarch’s Costume as the Means of Representation of Unity with the Population in Europe in the 17th — Early 19th Century. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 12. Eds A. V. Zakharova, S. V. Maltseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova. — St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Univ. Press, 2022, pp. 236–246. ISSN 2312-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa2212-03-16
Publication Article language russian
Bibliography
  • Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London; New York. Verso Publ., 1983. 214 p.
  • Aust C.; Klein D.; Weller Th. Introduction. Aust C.; Klein D.; Weller Th. (eds.). Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe. Berlin; Boston, De Gruyter Publ., 2019, pp. 1–12.
  • Backerra Ch. Personal Union, Composite Monarchy and ‘Multiple Rule’. Woodacre E.; Dean L. H. S.; Jones Ch.; Martin R. E.; Rohr Z. E. (eds.). The Routledge History of Monarchy. London, Routledge Publ., 2019, pp. 89–111.
  • Biedrońska-Słota B.; Molenda M. The Emergence of a Polish National Dress and Its Perception. Aust C.; Klein D.; Weller Th. (eds.). Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe. Berlin; Boston, De Gruyter Publ., 2019, pp. 113–136.
  • Burnham D. K. Cut My Cote. Toronto, Royal Ontario Museum Publ., 1973. 34 p.
  • Buzási E. Krönungsporträt Ferdinands III. von Justus Sustermans aus dem Jahre 1626. Die Ungarische Tracht als Mittel der Machtrepräsentation bei den Königskrönungen Anfang des 17. Jahrhunderts. Acta Historiae Artium: Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 2018, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 189–218 (in German).
  • Dózsa K. F. Die ungarische nationaltracht als Hofkleidung. Fazekas I.; Ujváry G.; Albrecht F. (eds.). Kaiser und König, 1526–1918. Wien, Collegium Hungaricum Publ., 2001, pp. 23–28 (in German).
  • Elliott J. H. A Europe of Composite Monarchies. Past & Present, 1992, November, no. 137, pp. 48–71.
  • Gellner E. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, Cornell University Press Publ., 1983. 150 p.
  • Géza G. Die künstlerische Representation der Habsburger-Könige in Ungarn bis 1848. Fazekas I.; Ujváry G. (eds.). Kaiser und König: eine historische Reise: Österreich und Ungarn, 1526–1918. Wien, Collegium Hungaricum Publ., 2001, pp. 9–18 (in German).
  • Guarino G. “The Antipathy between French and Spaniards”: Dress, Gender, and Identity in the Court Society of Early Modern Naples, 1501–1799. Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe. Berlin; Boston, De Gruyter Publ., 2019, pp. 13–32.
  • Hadjikyriakos I. Caterina Depicted. Zakharova A: Maltseva S.; Staniukovich-Denisova E. (eds.). Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of Articles, vol. 9. St. Petersburg, NP-Print, 2019, pp. 686–691. DOI: 10.18688/aa199-5-62
  • Hayward M. “A sutte of black which will always be of use to you”: Expressions of Difference and Similarity in the Clothing Choices of the Scottish Male Elite Travelling in Europe, 1550–1750. Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe. Berlin; Boston, De Gruyter Publ., 2019, pp. 33–50.
  • Heard K.; Jones K. (eds.). George IV: Art and Spectacle. London, Royal Collection Trust Publ., 2017, 294 p.
  • Hirschi C. The Origins of Nationalism: An Alternative History from Ancient Rome to Early Modern Germany. Cambridge; New York; Melbourne, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2012. 241 p.
  • Hobsbawm E. J. E. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1990. 191 p.
  • Koenigsberger H. G. Dominium regale or Dominium politicum et regale. Monarchies and Parliaments in Early Modern Europe. Koenigsberger H. G. (ed.). Politicians and Virtuosi: Essays in Early Modern History. London, Continuum International Publishing Group, 1986, pp. 191–217.
  • Martin M. Dairy Queens: Sexuality, Space and Subjectivity in Pleasure Dairies from Catherine de' Medici to Marie-Antoinette. Cambridge, MA, London, Harvard University Press Publ., 2011. 336 p.
  • Mertsalova M. N. Kostium raznykh vremen i narodov (Costume of Different Times and People), vol. 2. Moscow, Academiia Mody Publ., 1993. 429 p. (in Russian).
  • Miller A. I. (ed.). Natsionalizm i formirovanie natsii. Teorii – modeli – kontseptsii (Nationalism and Formation of Nations. Theories – Models – Concepts). Moscow, 1994. 198 p. (in Russian).
  • Miller A. I. The History of the Notion of “Nation” in Russia. “Notion of Russia”: To the Historical Semantics of Imperial Period, vol. 2. Moscow, NLO Publ., 2012, pp. 7–49 (in Russian).
  • Musset A. Stage Costume and Representation of History in Britain, 1776–1834: Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Warwick, Université Paris Diderot ‒ Paris 7, 2016. 469 p.
  • Norman A. V. B. George IV and Highland Dress. Review of Scottish Culture, vol. 10, pp. 5–15.
  • Noyes D. La Maja Vestida: Dress as Resistance to Enlightenment in Late-18th-Century Madrid. The Journal of American Folklore, 1998, Spring (In Modern Dress: Costuming the European Social Body, 17th–20th Centuries), vol. 111, no. 440, pp. 197–217.
  • Pittock M. Plaiding the Invention of Scotland. Brown I. (ed.). From Tartan to Tartanry: Scottish Culture, History and Myth. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press Publ., 2012, pp. 32–47.
  • Polleroß F. Austriacus Hungariae Rex. Zur Darstellung der Habsburger als ungarische Könige in der frühneuzeitlich en Graphik. Bubryák O. (ed.). “Ez világ, mint egy kert ...”: tanulmányok Galavics Géza tiszteletére. Budapest, Gondolat, Művészettörténeti Kutatóintézet Publ., 2010, pp. 63–78 (in German).
  • Rozek M. Polskie koronacje i korony. Kraków, Krajowa Agencja Wydawnicza Publ., 1987. 159 p. (in Polish).
  • Serfőző S. “Männlich” und mächtig. Die Inszenierung Maria Theresias als Königin von Ungarn auf Staatsporträts. Maria Theresia, 1717–1780: Strategin. Mutter. Reformerin. Wien, Amalthea Signum Verlag Publ., 2017, pp. 107–111 (in German).
  • Serfőző S. Themen und Formen der Repräsentation Maria Theresias in Ungarn. Telesko W.; Hertel S.; Linsboth S. (eds.). Die Repräsentation Maria Theresias. Herrschaft und Bildpolitik im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. (Schriftenreihe der Österreichischen Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts, vol. 19). Wien, Böhlau Verlag Publ., 2020, pp. 311–322 (in German).
  • Smith E. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford, B. Blackwell Publ., 1986. 312 p.
  • Trevor-Roper H. The Invention of Tradition: the Highland Tradition of Scotland. Hobsbawm E.; Ranger T. (eds.). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1983, pp. 15–41.
  • Watt P.; Waine R. Wild and Majestic: Romantic Visions of Scotland. Edinburgh, National Museums Scotland Publ., 2019. 96 p.
  • Weller Th. “He Knows Them by Their Dress”: Dress and Otherness in Early Modern Spain. Dress and Cultural Difference in Early Modern Europe. Berlin; Boston, De Gruyter Publ., 2019, pp. 52–72.
  • Wendeln M. S. Princess on the Margins: Toward a New Portrait of Madame Elisabeth de France. Wayne State University Dissertations, Paper 1322, 2015. 313 p.
  • Wortman R. S. Scenarios of Power: Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy, vol. 1 (From Peter the Great to the Death of Nicholas I). Princeton, Princeton University Press Publ., 1995. 469 p.
  • Zanardi T. Crafting Spanish Female Identity: Silk Lace Mantillas at the Crossroads of Tradition and Fashion. Material Culture Review, 2013, no. 77, pp. 139–157.
  • Zanardi T. Framing Majismo: Art and Royal Identity in Eighteenth-Century Spain. University Park, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania University Press Publ., 2016. 250 p.