Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa200-3-47
Title Boundaries and Horizons of Realism in the Contemporary Painting of St. Petersburg
Author email grachewasvetlana@yandex.ru
About author Gracheva, Svetlana Michailovna — full doctor, dean of the faculty of the theory and history of arts, professor. St. Petersburg State Academy Institute of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of I. Repin of the Russian Academy of Arts, Universitetskaia nab., 17, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
In the section International Art in the 20th and 21st Centuries DOI10.18688/aa200-3-47
Year 2020 Volume 10 Pages 535545
Type of article RAR Index UDK 75.03+7.036.1 Index BBK 85.143(2)6
Abstract

In recent times, there has been a lot of discussions in St. Petersburg’s artistic community about problems of modern realistic fine arts. Even more obvious is the confrontation between different trends of fine arts promoting themselves as “contemporaries”. The problem of modern realism does exist.This is a broad term which implies dozens of directions and methods in art and diversity of its interpretations. Along with traditions, there are novelties in modern realism that are linked to a wider range of achievements of national and world culture. These include the experience of the artistic avant-garde, modernism and postmodernism of the 20th century, the influence of contemporary art trends and even participation of artists-adherents of Academism in contemporary art events.

In the contemporary artworld of St. Petersburg, there is a generation of artists who do not seek to break away from the academicschool, but they are keenly aware of the need to update their artistic language. They are not radical, and they do not deny the principles of imaging, figurativeness, and picturesqueness in realistic art works.They have reached a high level of craft, but they feel dissatisfaction from the art limited to formal experiments and distanced far from the reality. Looking at the works of these artists, a viewer involuntarily compares them with each other, trying to find their place in the modern art scene. Notably, the artists borrowed much from the academic school, having learned the lessons of their mentors — masters of St. Petersburg fine arts. However, this is a very special view of the world and art that transforms reality. Our modern postindustrial, post-informational, postmodern world has also formed a new vision of reality demonstrated by the artists of the 2010s.

Keywords
Reference Gracheva, Svetlana M. Boundaries and Horizons of Realism in the Contemporary Painting of St. Petersburg. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 10. Ed: A. V. Zakharova, S. V. Maltseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova. — Lomonosov Moscow State University / St. Petersburg: NP-Print, 2020, pp. 535–545. ISSN 2312-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa200-3-47
Publication Article language russian
Bibliography
  • Borev Iu. B. Sotsialisticheskii realizm: vzgliad sovremennika i sovremennyi vzgliad (Socialist Realism: A Contemporary View and a Modern View). Moscow, AST Olimp Publ., 2008. 478 p. (in Russian).
  • Dmitrenko A. F.; Bakhtiiarov R. A. St. Petersburg (Leningrad) School of Art and Contemporary Art. Peterburgskii khudozhnik (St. Petersburg Artist), 2017, no. 1, pp. 74–90 (in Russian).
  • Fomina M. S. Images and Problems of Modern Realism — in the Context of the Exhibitions of Young Artists of the Union of Artists of St. Petersburg in 2015–2017. Maltseva S. V.; Staniukovich-Denisova E. Iu.; Zakharova A. V. (eds.). Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of Articles, vol. 8. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press Publ., 2018, pp. 779–787. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa188–10–76 (accessed 25 January 2019) (in Russian).
  • Garaudi R. D’un réalisme sans rivages. Picasso. Saint-John Perse. Kafka. Paris, Plon Publ., 1963. 250 p. (in French).
  • Gracheva S. M. Is Contemporary Academic Art Indeed Contemporary? Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii v KAzNAI im. Zhurgenova (g. Almaty): Voprosy iskusstvovedeniia XX — nachala XXI v. (Issues of Art Criticism of the Late 20th and Early 21st Centuries. Materials of International Scientific Conference). Almaty, Kazakh National Academy of arts Publ., 2016, pp. 241–248 (in Russian).
  • Gracheva S. M. The Art and War. Contemporary Academic Fine Art of St. Petersburg. According to the Materials of the Exhibitions in 2015. Nauchnye trudy instituta imeni I. E. Repina (Research Papers оf the I. E. Repin Institute), 2016, vol. 36, pp. 186–203 (in Russian).
  • Gracheva S. M. Faces of Modern Academic Realism. Nauchnye trudy instituta imeni I. E. Repina (Research Papers оf the I. E. Repin Institute), 2016, vol. 38, pp. 108–127 (in Russian).
  • Gracheva S. M. Academic Fine Arts in Contemporary Conditions. Sovremennoe iskusstvo v kontekste globalizatsii. Nauka, obrazovanie, khudozhestvennyi rynok. Materialy VI Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Contemporary Art in the Context of Globalization. Science, Education, Art Market. Materials of the 6th All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference). St. Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg University of Humanities and Social Sciences Publ., 2016, pp. 15–16 (in Russian).
  • Gracheva S. M. The Genre of Still Life in Contemporary Painting of St. Petersburg Artists-Academicians. Maltseva S. V.; Staniukovich-Denisova E. Iu.; Zakharova A. V. (eds.). Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of Articles, vol. 8. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press Publ., 2018, pp. 456–466. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/аа188–4–44 (accessed 25 January 2019) (in Russian).
  • Iakovleva N. A. Zhanry russkoi zhivopisi. Osnovy teorii i metodiki sistemno-istoricheskogo analiza (Genres of Russian Painting. Fundamentals of the Theory and Methodology of Systemic-Historical Analysis). Leningrad, Hertsen State University Publ., 1986. 83 p. (in Russian).
  • Iakovleva N. A. Istoricheskaia kartina v russkoi zhivopisi. Russkaia istoricheskaia zhivopis’ (Historical Painting in Russian Art. Russian Historical Painting). Moscow, Belyi gorod Publ., 2005. 656 p. (in Russian).
  • Kuteiinikova N. S. Bystrov A. K. Al’bom (Bystrov A. K. Album). Lyaonin Publ., 2001. 119 p. (in Russian and in Chinese).
  • Kuteinikova N. S. Hamid Savkuev. Life Lessons and Composition. Hamid Savkuev. Album. St. Petersburg, Artindex Publ., 2009, pp. 5–15 (in Russian).
  • Kuteinikova N. S.; Sazonova K. K. The Leningrad School of Painting. Leningradskaia zhivopisnaia shkola. Sotsrealizm (The Leningrad School of Painting. Socialist Realism). St. Petersburg, Kolomenskaia versta Publ., 2008, pp. 3–5 (in Russian).
  • Lenyashin V. A. Edinitsa khraneniia. Russkaia zhivopis’ — opyt muzeinogo istolkovaniia (The Unit of Storage. Russian Painting — the Experience of Museum Interpretation). St. Petersburg, Zolotoi vek Publ., 2014. 439 p. (in Russian).
  • Lenyashin V. A. I Am Always for Artists. Interview. Peterburgskii khudozhnik (St. Petersburg Artist), 2017, no. 1, pp. 147–153 (in Russian).
  • Manin V. S. Russkaia zhivopis’ 20 veka: Al’bom (Russian Painting of the 20th Century. Album), 3 vols. St. Petersburg, Avrora Publ., 2007. 415 p.; 455 p.; 551 p. (in Russian).
  • Mochalov L. V. Prostranstvo mira i prostranstvo kartiny: ocherki o iazyke zhivopisi (The World Space and the Space of Painting: Essays on the Language of Painting). Moscow, Sovetskii khudozhnik Publ, 1983. 375 p. (in Russian).
  • Pankratova I. Interview with А. Nikolaeva-Berg. Obshchestvennyi kontrol’. Available at: //https://ok-inform.ru/obshchestvo/642-novoe-pokolenie-poteryalo-istoricheskuyu-pamyat.html (accessed 20 December 2018).
  • Sazonova K. K. Viktor Oreshnikov (Strokes to the Creative Biography). Nauchnye trudy Instituta imeni I. E. Repina (Research Papers оf the I. E. Repin Institute), 2016, vol. 36, pp. 170–185 (in Russian).
  • Tuluzakova G. The Article to a New Catalogue of N. Blokhin. Available at http://nikolay-blokhin.com/publications/articles (accessed 15 December 2018).