Klyushina, Elena V.; Mal’tseva, Svetlana V.; Staniukovich-Denisova, Ekaterina Iu. Artifact. Art-Object. Argument. An Object in Fine Arts: Acquisition of New Meanings in Modern and Contemporary Eras

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa188-0-1
Title Artifact. Art-Object. Argument. An Object in Fine Arts: Acquisition of New Meanings in Modern and Contemporary Eras
Author email e.klyushina@spbu.ru
About author Klyushina, Elena Vital’evna — head lecturer. Saint Petersburg State University. Universitetskaia nab., 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. e.klyushina@spbu.ru Mal’tseva, Svetlana Vladislavovna — Ph. D., head lecturer. Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaia nab., 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. s.maltseva@spbu.ru Staniukovich-Denisova, Ekaterina Iurevna — head lecturer. Saint Petersburg State University. Universitetskaia nab., 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. e.stanyukovich-denisova@spbu.ru
In the section Artifact. Art-Object. Argument. An Object in Fine Arts: Acquisition of New Meanings in Modern and Contemporary Eras DOI10.18688/aa188-0-1
Year 2018 Volume 8 Pages 15–25
Type of article RAR Index UDK 7.01 Index BBK 85.1
Abstract

Summing up the results of the conference “Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art VII”, held in autumn 2016 in the State Hermitage and Saint Petersburg State University, the authors of this article note a significant extension of the definitional possibilities of the terms “artifact” and “art object” in Modern and Contemporary eras. The main theoretical conclusions are made with an eye for the works of T. de Duve, J. Baudrillard, T. Adorno, G. Dickie and other authors. Turning to a direct analysis of the texts included in the collection of articles, the authors point to a variety of analytical approaches chosen by the participants in the conference to define the terms “artifact” and “art object” in the fine arts of the 17th-21st centuries.
Keywords
Reference Klyushina, Elena V.; Mal’tseva, Svetlana V.; Staniukovich-Denisova, Ekaterina Iu. Artifact. Art-Object. Argument. An Object in Fine Arts: Acquisition of New Meanings in Modern and Contemporary Eras. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 8. Ed. S. V. Mal’tseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova, A. V. Zakharova. — St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Univ. Press, 2018, pp. 15–25. ISSN 2312-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa188-0-1
Publication Article language english
Bibliography
  • Adorno T. W. Ästhetische Theorie. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Publ., 1970. 544 p. (in German).
  • Baudrillard J. Le Système des objets: la consommation des signes. Paris, Gallimard Publ., 1968. 288 p. (in French).
  • Benjamin W. Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. I, Werkausgabe Band 2. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Publ., 1980, pp. 431-469 (in German).
  • De Duve T. Au nom de lart: pour une archéologie de la modernité. Paris, éditions de Minuit Publ., 1988. 145 p. (in French).
  • Dickie G. Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. New York, Cornell University Press Publ., 1974. 204 p.
  • Flier A. Ia. Interpretation of the Meaning of History: An Event as a Cultural Artifact. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie (Knowledge. Understanding. Skill). Available at: http://journals.mosgu.ru/zpu/article/view/579 (accessed 02 December 2017).
  • Foucault P.-M. Les Mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris, Gallimard Publ., 1966. 404 p. (in French).
  • Gracheva S. M.; Jijina N. C.; Zakharova A. V.; Kochetkova E. S.; Lopukhova M. A.; Mal’tseva S. V., Rykov A. V., Skvortcova E. A., Stanyukovich-Denisova E. I. Report on the 7th International Conference “Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art”, St. Petersburg, October 11–15, 2016. Historical Studies. Journal of the Lomonosov Moscow State University Historical Faculty, 2019, no. 3 (in print).
  • Jijina N. C.; Mal’tseva S. V.; Staniukovich-Denisova E. I. Artifact. Art-Object. Argument. An Object in Fine Arts: Objectives, Methods, Results. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles, vol. 7. Eds. S. V. Mal’tseva, E. Yu. Staniukovich-Denisova, A. V. Zakharova. Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg University Publ., 2017, pp. 15-20 (in Russian). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa177-0-1 (accessed 27 December 2017).
  • Kant I. Critique of Practical Reason. Saint Petersburg, M. V. Popov Publ., 1897. 193 p. (in Russian).
  • Khanon Yu. Alphonse Allais: Alphonse Who Did Not Exist. Moscow, Liki Rosiii Publ., 2013. 544 p. (in Russian).
  • Kochetkova E. Eric de Chassey: “Questions and Methods of Art History Should Be Rooted in the Present; Otherwise, They Are Valueless”. Iskisstvoznanie (Art Studies), 2017, no. 4, pp. 10-27 (in Russian).
  • Krasnoglazov А. B. Funktsionirovanie artefakta v kul’turno-semanticheskom prostranstve (The Functioning of the Artifact in the Cultural and Semantic Space), Ph. D. Thesis. Moscow, 1996. 290 p. (in Russian).
  • Vilensky J. European Porcelain of the 18th Century as an Artifact and an Art-Object or the Compotier’s Story. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles, vol. 8. Eds. S. V. Mal’tseva, E. Yu. Staniukovich-Denisova, A. V. Zakharova. Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg University Publ., 2018, pp. 637-644. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa188-7-62 (accessed 27 August 2018) (in Russian).