Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa155-8-85
Title Appropriation of Images of Antiquity in the Work of Jeff Koons
Author email kadares@gmail.com
About author Shchetinina, Nataliya Vladimirovna – Ph. D. student. Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaia nab., 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
In the section Art of the 20th–21st Centuries. Faces of Classical Antiquity in the Labyrinth of Modernity DOI10.18688/aa155-8-85
Year 2015 Volume 5 Pages 768773
Type of article RAR Index UDK 7.036 Index BBK 85.03
Abstract

Using the example of Gazing Ball series this study examines the problem of appropriation in the art of Jeff Koons. The changes of images of antiquity (which have taken place with the appropriation) are analyzed in this article as well as the problems that emerged after the connection of such images with kitsch. In the article attention is drawn not only to the fact of using the appropriation, but the variety of conceptual lines introduced by means of appropriation in the artist’s works. The analysis of these works shows a fundamental strategy that J. Koons follows — the strategy of eliminating elitism of so called “high art” and bringing its legacy to mass-culture. The artist creates intelligible language that any audience can comprehend. This is a lexicon developed from the modes of advertising, kitsch and pop-culture. Combining kitsch and European tradition of art, Koons points out the problem of perception encountering knowledge. The elements of kitsch help the audience to recognize images immediately. Images of familiar and comprehendible things (like those from the supermarket) do not disturb the spectator. The artist refers to the tradition of art considering the level of audience’s sophistication and its ability to understand the specific group of signs that circulate in the media and advertising. J. Koons neutralizes classical images charged with information and puts it in the context of mass culture. The artist creates a steady set of new images and represents the tradition of art in terms of advertising, kitsch and pop-culture, available to the wide audience. Such tactics evoke wide range of issues linked with the coexistence of traditional and contemporary art.

Keywords
Reference Nataliya Shchetinina. Appropriation of Images of Antiquity in the Work of Jeff Koons. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 5. Eds: Svetlana V. Maltseva, Ekaterina Yu. Stanyukovich-Denisova, Anna V. Zakharova. St. Petersburg, NP-Print Publ., 2015, pp. 768–773. ISSN 2312-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa155-8-85
Publication Article language russian
Bibliography
  • Andreeva E. Y. Postmodernism: The art of the Second Half of the 20th – 21st Century. Saint Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika Publ., 2007. 488 p. (in Russian).
  • Benjamin W. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. London, Penguin Publ., 2008. 128 p.
  • Bonami F.; Zwirner D. (eds.). Jeff Koons: Gazing ball. New York, David Zwirner Books Publ., 2014. 80 p.
  • Buchloh B. H. D. After Laughter. October, 2009, Vol. 129, pp. 13–50.
  • Buchloh B. H. D. Allegorical Procedures: Appropriation and Montage in Contemporary Art. Artforum, 1982, no. 21, vol. 1, pp. 43–56.
  • Buchloh B. H. D. Drawing Blanks: Notes on Andy Warhol’s Late Works. October, 2009, vol. 127, pp. 3–24.
  • Buskirk M. Commodification as censor. October, 1992, vol. 60, pp. 82–109.
  • Cooke L. Jeff Koons. New York, Sonnabend Gallery Publ. The Burlington Magazine, 1989, vol. 131, pp. 246–247.
  • Crow T. Hand-Made Photographs and Homeless Representation. October, 1992, vol. 62, pp. 123–132.
  • Crow T. The Absconded Subject of Pop. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 2009, vol. 55–56, pp. 5–20.
  • Evans D. Appropriation. Cambridge Mass, The MIT Press Publ., 2009. 239 p.
  • Foster H. At the Whitney. London Review of Books, 2014, vol. 36, no 15, pp. 22–23.
  • Foster H. Recodings: Art, Spectacle, Cultural Politics. New York, The New Press, 1998. 256 p.
  • Foster H. Return of the Real: The Avant-garde at the End of the Century. Cambridge Mass, The MIT Press Publ., 1996. 299 p.
  • Foster H.; Krauss R.; Buchloh B H D. and et. Art since 1900: modernism, antimodernism, postmodernism. London, Thames & Hudson, 2012. 816 p.
  • Hollein M. (ed.). Jeff Koons: The Painter and the Sculptor. Hamburg, Hatje Cantz, 2012. 392 p.
  • Holzwarth H. W. Jeff Koons. Cologne, Taschen Publ., 2009. 592 p.
  • Hopkins D. After Modern Art 1945–2000. New York, Oxford University Press Publ., 2000. 282 p.
  • Krauss R.; Hollier D. and et. The Reception of the Sixties. October, 1994, vol. 69, pp. 3–21.
  • McLuhan M. Understanding Media. New York, Routledge Classics Publ., 2001. 394 p.
  • Muthesius A. Jeff Koons. Cologne, Taschen Publ., 1992. 176 p.
  • Pearlman A. Unpackaging Art of the 1980s. Chicago, University of Chicago Press Publ., 2003. 230 p.
  • Rikov A. V. The Basis of Art Theory. Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg State University Publ., 2007. 113 p.
  • Schwartz L. F. Computers and Appropriation Art: The Transformation of a Work or Idea for a New Creation. Leonardo, 1996, vol. 29, pp. 43–49.
  • Shurkus M. B. Appropriation Art: Moving Images and Presenting Difference. Montreal, Concordia University Publ., 2006. 370 p.
  • Smith R. Gladiatorial Combat: The Battle of the Big. The New York Times. 2013. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/arts/design/jeff-koons-at-david-zwirner-and-gagosian-and-paul-mccarthy-at-hauser-wirth.html
  • Tomkins C. Lives of the Artists. New York, Holt Paperbacks Publ., 2010. 272 p.
  • Varnedoe K. Innocence and Experience. MoMA, 2000, vol. 3, pp. 2–5.
  • Welchman J. Art After Appropriation: Essays on Art in the 1990s. London, Routledge Publ., 2001. 312 p.