Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title Neoclassicism in Architecture and Poetry of the 1910s and 1910s: The Commonality of the Problem Field
Author email
About author Babadzhan, Svetlana G. — Ph. D. applicant. State Institute for Art Studies, Kozitsky per., 5, 125009 Moscow, Russian Federation. ORCID: 0000-0002-0832-8217
In the section International Art in the 20th and 21st Centuries DOI10.18688/aa2212-05-31
Year 2022 Volume 12 Pages 414425
Type of article RAR Index UDK 7.035(2) Index BBK 85.11 + 83.3(2Рос=Рус)1

The article attempts to compare the programs of Neoclassicism in Russian architecture and poetry of the 1900s and 1910s. The convergence of two unrelated types of art allows however to reveal the commonality of the problem field. The similarity was revealed in the following issues: the chronological boundaries of the style, ideological attitudes among neoclassicists, perception of historical tradition, actualization of the problem of mastery, and terminology used. The field of neoclassical poetics and architecture is also united by the contradictory goals of the style: the revival of the classical ideal is impossible in the situation of multidirectional stylistic trends of the art in the beginning of the century. The interdisciplinary analysis of the poetics and architecture of neoclassicism has allowed us to understand the position of architecture in the board context of neoclassical culture and to point out that the formation of the architectural style is determined by the unity of the artistic process.

Reference Babadzhan, Svetlana G. Neoclassicism in Architecture and Poetry of the 1910s and 1910s: The Commonality of the Problem Field. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 12. Eds A. V. Zakharova, S. V. Maltseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova. — St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Univ. Press, 2022, pp. 414–425. ISSN 2312-2129.
Publication Article language russian
  • Belyi A. Simvolizm (Symbolism). Moscow, Musaget Publ., 1910. 633 p. (in Russian).
  • Benua A. N. The Picturesque St. Petersburg City. Mir iskusstva (The World of Art), 1902, no. 1, pp. 1–5 (in Russian).
  • Benua A. N. The Architecture of St. Petersburg. Mir iskusstva (The World of Art), 1902, no. 4, pp. 82–85 (in Russian).
  • Borisova E. A.; Venediktov A. I.; Kazhdan T. P. Architecture and Architectural Life. Russkaia khudozhestvennaia kul’tura kontsa 19 – nachala 20 veka (Russian Art Culture of the Late 19th – Early 20th Century), 1980, vol. 4, pp. 297–364 (in Russian).
  • Borisova E.A.; Khazanova V. E. (ed.). Sud’by neoklassicizma v 20 veke (The Fate of Neoclassicism in the 20th Century). Moscow, State Institute of Art Studies Publ., 1997. 164 p. (in Russian).
  • Borisova E. A.; Sternin G. I. Russkii Neoklassitsizm (Russian Neoclassicism). Moscow, Galart Publ., 2002. 288 p. (in Russian).
  • Davydova O. S. The Dynamics of Studying Symbolism: Contextualizing the Russian Contribution within the European Tradition. Zakharova A. V.; Maltseva S. V.; Stanyukovich-Denisova E. Yu. (eds.). Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of Articles, vol. 11. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press Publ., 2021, pp. 743–756 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18688/aa2111-07-60
  • Fomin I. A. (ed.). Istoricheskaia vystavka architektury i khudozhestvennoi promyshlennosti (Historical Exhibition of Architecture and Art Industry: Catalogue). St. Petersburg, Tovarishchestvo Marks A. F. Publ., 1912. 336 p. (in Russian).
  • Gorodetskii N. S. Some Trends in the Modern Russian Poetry. Apollon (Apollo), 1913, no. 1, pp. 46–50 (in Russian).
  • Gumilev N. S. The Legacy of Symbolism and Acmeism. Apollon (Apollo), 1913, no. 1, pp. 42–50 (in Russian).
  • Kantor-Kazovsky L. Mandelstam’s Architectural Metaphor. Cahiers du Monde russe, 2001, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 95–114 (in Russian).
  • Kirichenko I. E. Neoclassicism and Acmeism in Russian Art of the Early 20th Century. Voprosy iskusstvoznaniia (Issues of Art Studies), 1994, no. 2–3, pp. 358–372 (in Russian).
  • Kuzmin M. A. About Beautiful Clarity. Apollon (Apollo), 1910, no. 4, pp. 5–10 (in Russian).
  • Lekmanov O. A. Kniga ob akmeizme i drugie raboty (The Book about Acmeism and Other Works). Tomsk, Vodolei Publ., 2000. 704 p. (in Russian).
  • Lukomskii G. K. Sovremennyi Peterburg (Modern St. Petersburg). St. Petersburg, Kolo Publ., 2003. 144 p. (in Russian).
  • Makovskii S. K. Introduction. Apollon (Apollo), 1909, no. 1, pp. 3–4 (in Russian).
  • Mandel’shtam O. E. Sobranie sochinenii (Collected Works), vol. 4. Moscow, Art Bisnes Tsentr Publ.,1999. 609 p. (in Russian).
  • Revzin G. I. Neoklassitsizm v russkoi arkhitekture nachala 20 veka (Neoclassicism in Russian Architecture of the Early 20th Century). Moscow, VNIITAG Publ., 1992. 169 p. (in Russian).
  • Shubinskii V. Zodchii. Zhizn Nikolaia Gumileva (The Architect. Life of Nikolay Gumilev). Moscow, AST Publ., 2014. 735 p. (in Russian).
  • Sternin G. I. Khudozhestvennaia zhizn’ Rossii 1900–1910-kh godov (The Artistic Life of Russia in the 1900s and 1910s). Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1988. 285 p. (in Russian).
  • Zhirmunskii V. M. Teoriia Literatury (The Theory of Literature). Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1977. 407 p. (in Russian).