Khmelev, Roman A. The Problem of Medium Specificity in European Theoretical Art History of the Second Half of the 20th Century

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa2212-07-52
Title The Problem of Medium Specificity in European Theoretical Art History of the Second Half of the 20th Century
Author email romckicus@gmail.com
About author Khmelev, Roman A. — M. A., Ph. D. student. Saint Petersburg Stieglitz State Academy of Art and Design, Solianoi per., 13, 1910285 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. ORCID: 0000-0002-5895-6668
In the section Art Theory DOI10.18688/aa2212-07-52
Year 2022 Volume 12 Pages 656–662
Type of article RAR Index UDK 7.08 Index BBK 85.143(3)
Abstract

In this work, the author focuses on the analysis of methodologies in which the problem of medium specificity appears, and the identification of aspects of the theory in them, aimed at the analysis and interpretation of the components specific for painting, which located both in material planes and in various symbolic spaces.

The first part of the study is devoted to the analysis of the problem of the medium specificity in the studies of K. Greenberg. The author traces how arguments in favor of medium specificity are formed in the works of an American art critic, as well as a special attitude towards paintings. Increased attention has been paid to those aspects of Greenberg's theory that are aimed at the analyzing painting through the material features of the medium.

The second part of the work examines the key features of the theory of H. Damisch and N. Bryson. One of the common features of the studies of French theorist and Anglo-American researcher is the increased attention to material traces and marks on the surface of the work, which in semiotic theory are “index”. This approach contributes to the formation of a methodology that is based on the medium specificity of the work, on the one hand, and, on the other, is not limited to the analysis of only the formalistic aspect. This method can be the most productive in relation to the painting of the late 20th — early 21st centuries, which can be based on both modernism attitude and a moment of its rethinking or negation.
Keywords
Reference Khmelev, Roman A. The Problem of Medium Specificity in European Theoretical Art History of the Second Half of the 20th Century. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 12. Eds A. V. Zakharova, S. V. Maltseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova. — St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Univ. Press, 2022, pp. 656–662. ISSN 2312-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.18688/aa2212-07-52
Publication Article language russian
Bibliography
  • Bal M.; Bryson N. Semiotics and Art History. The Art Bulletin, 1991, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 174–208.
  • Bryson N. Watteau and Reverie: A Test case in “Combined Analysis”. The Eighteenth Century, 1981, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 97–126.
  • Bryson N. Tradition and Desire: From David to Delacroix. Cambridge, 1984. 252 p.
  • Bryson N. Vision and Painting: The Logic of the Gaze. London, Yale University Press, 1985. 189 p.
  • Bryson N. The Gaze in the Expanded Field. Vision and Visuality. Seattle, Bay Press, 1988, pp. 87–108.
  • Bryson N. The Post-Ideological Avant-Garde. Inside Out: New Chinese Art. London, University of California Press, 1988, pp. 51–58.
  • Bryson N. Morimura: Three Readings. Art+Text, 1995, no. 52, pp. 74–79.
  • Bryson N. Word and Image: French Painting of the Ancient Regime. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995. 281 p.
  • Bryson N. Westernizing Bodies: Women, Art, and Power in Meiji Yōga. Gender and Power: In the Japanese Visual Field. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press, 2003, pp. 89–118.
  • Chierico A. Medium specificity in post-media practice. V!RUS e-journal. 2016. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/30274166/Medium_Specificity_in_Post-Media_Practice (accessed 26 February 2020).
  • Damisch H. Five Notes for a Phenomenology of the Photographic Image. October, 1978, vol. 5, pp. 70–72.
  • Damisch H. Traite du trait: Tractatus tractus. Paris, Réunion des Musées Nationaux Publ., 1995. 214 p. (in French).
  • Damisch H. The Origin of Perspective. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1995. 477 p.
  • Damisch H. The Judgment of Paris (Analytic Iconology; 1). Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1996. 396 p.
  • Damisch H. Semiotics and Iconography. The Art of Art History: A Critical Anthology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 236–243.
  • Damisch H. Skyline: The Narcissistic City (Cultural Memory in the Present). Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2002. 190 p.
  • Damisch H. A Theory of /Cloud/: Toward a History of Painting. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2002. 329 p.
  • Damisch H. A Childhood Memory by Piero della Francesca (Cultural Memory in the Present). Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2007. 136 p.
  • Damisch H. Hoah’s Ark: Essays on Architecture. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2016. 392 p.
  • Greenberg C. Towards a Newer Laocoon. Partisan Review, 1940, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 296–310.
  • Greenberg C. Modern and Postmodern. Arts. 1980. No. 6. Available at: www.sharecom.ca/greenberg/postmodernism.html (accessed 01 March 2020).
  • Greenberg C. The Decline of Cubism. Art in Theory 1900–1990: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell Publ., 1993, pp. 569–572.
  • Greenberg C. Modernist Painting. Art in Theory 1900–1990: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell Publ., 1993, pp. 754–760.
  • Greenberg C. After Abstract Expressionism. Art in Theory 1900-1990: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell Publ., 1993, pp. 766–769.
  • Koshut J. Art after Philosophy. Art in Theory 1900–1990: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell Publ., 1993, pp. 840–850.
  • Krauss R. Notes on the Index: Seventies Art in America. October, 1977, vol. 3, pp. 68–81.
  • Krauss R. A Voyage on the North Sea. Art in the Age of the Post-medium Condition. London, Thames and Hudson Publ, 2000. 64 p.
  • Makeeva S. O. Rhetoric of Arts’ Boundaries in the 1960s and the Establishing of Postmedial Installation Art. Zakharova A.; Maltseva S.; Staniukovich-Denisova E. (ed.). Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of Articles, vol. 10. Lomonosov Moscow State University; St. Petersburg, NP-Print Publ., 2020, pp. 555–565 (in Russian) DOI: 10.18688/aa200-3-49
  • Rykov A. V. Theory of Art: Fundamentals. St. Petersburg, Academy Publ., 2007. 116 p. (in Russian).
  • Stainberg L. Other Criteria: Confrontations with Twentieth-Century Art. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2007. 436 p.
  • Venkova A. V. Digital Immersive Environments in Art: New Anthropological Horizons. Zakharova A.; Maltseva S.; Staniukovich-Denisova E. (ed.). Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of Articles, vol. 10. Lomonosov Moscow State University; St. Petersburg, NP-Print Publ., 2020, pp. 649–655 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18688/aa200-4-60