Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title Athens and Rome Contrasted: The Present Challenge of Managing Two Manners of Classicism
Author email
About author Loukaki, Argyro — D. Phil. Oxon., professor, director of program in Greek Civilization and Culture. Hellenic Open University, Aristotelous 18, Patras 263 35, Greece.;
In the section European Art in the Modern Times DOI10.18688/aa200-1-6
Year 2020 Volume 10 Pages 7486
Type of article RAR Index UDK 711.523:904, 719 Index BBK 85.110

The main contribution of the present article is the original comparison of the archetypal yet different classicisms of Athens and Rome, with emphasis on the physical, metaphysical, aesthetic and moral aspects of the management of their central archaeological loci. Athens and Rome are the two preeminent classical cities globally. Their world heritage has been nurturing for centuries global collective memory, creativity, inspiration, and myth. The Sacred Rock of the Athenian Acropolis is the epitome of democracy, classical beauty and urban constitution; the Acropolis spatialities are a form of vital energy. The Roman Forum, alongside the neighboring Colosseum, joins and represents imperial power, structural prowess and prominent urbanism. Enduring through tests of time, iconic classical ruins stage modern urban action, real and symbolic.They recapitulate cities as syntactic urban permanences, trigger new creativity, and loom in struggles over nationaland global representation — indicatively, following the “fever for marble,” classical ruins involuntarilysupplied museum collections with architectural members and statues —, plus artistic relevance and progress.

With regard to the planning–preservation interface, major archaeological urban landscapes like the Acropolis and the Forum–Colosseum pair are usually involved in six distinct processes. First, their unearthing usually demands planned excavation expeditions. Second, subject to various preservation regulations, the new development around them may be completely stopped or highly controlled with the effect that urban density is drastically lowered. Third, they may undergo restoration, a demanding and time-consuming process which radically alters their public presence. Fourth, they may be accompanied by museums specifically built in their vicinity, like it happens in this case with the New Acropolis Museum. Fifth, they are usually linked to the surrounding urban space, and sometimes to other archaeological sites, via landscaped gardens and pedestrian zones functioning as transitional areas or corridors. Sixth, they may necessitate protection from environmental pollution, infrastructural works or other sources of deterioration.

The points addressed by the article are the prosaic and sublime aspects of classicism(s) plus similarities and differences between Athens and Rome. Their archaeological cores inspire creative imagination in architectural, artistic, aesthetic and literary terms. More specifically, in this article are discussed: the Greek archaeological context in conjunction with a number of important issues; the Italian archaeological and political context before and after Fascism, in parallel with the Roman past and ruins; the formation of the Athenian archaeological landscape in the 1950s as a major accomplishment of architect Dimitris Pikionis; the present Roman archaeological landscape, compared with Pikionis’. Further, aesthetic notions like the urban uncanny and urban lightness/luminosity are substantiated around Roman and Athenian classicism respectively.

Reference Loukaki, Argyro. Athens and Rome Contrasted: The Present Challenge of Managing Two Manners of Classicism. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 10. Ed: A. V. Zakharova, S. V. Maltseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova. — Lomonosov Moscow State University / St. Petersburg: NP-Print, 2020, pp. 74–86. ISSN 2312-2129.
Publication Article language english
  • 1. Agnew J. Rome. Chichester, West Sussex, John Wiley Publ., 1995. 189 + xiv p.
  • 2. Benjamin A. Working with Walter Benjamin: Recovering a Political Philosophy. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press Publ., 2013. 272 p.
  • 3. Bourdieu P. Le Sens Pratique. Paris, Editions de Minuit Publ., 1980. 480 p. (in French).
  • 4. Coetzee J. M. The Man Who Went Shopping for Truth, 2001. Available at: (accessed 1 May 2019).
  • 5. de Lillo D. The Names. New York, Vintage Publ., 1982. 352 p.
  • 6. Foster B.; Marcovitz H. Rome, with introduction by Harold Bloom. New York, Chelsea House Publ., 2005. 197 p.
  • 7. Frampton K. A Note on Greek Architecture: 1938–1997. Aisopos Y.; Simeoforides G. (eds.). Landscapes of Modernization — Greek Architecture in the 1960s and 1990s. Athens, Metapolis Publ., 2002. 144 p. (in Greek).
  • 8. Gammon M. Modernity and the Crisis of Aesthetic Representation in Hegel’s Early Writings. Maker W. (ed.). Hegel and Aesthetics. New York, State University of New York Publ., 2000, pp. 145–160.
  • 9. Giustozzi N. The Colosseum Book. Milan, Electa Publ., 2017. 256 p.
  • 10. Harvey D. Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference. Oxford, Blackwell Publ., 1996. 480 p.
  • 11. Herzfeld M. Evicted From Eternity —The Restructuring of Modern Rome. Chicago, University of Chicago Press Publ., 2009. 392 p.
  • 12. Kirk T. R. The Political Topography of Modern Rome, 1870–1936. Via XX Settembre to Via dell’Impero. Caldwell D.; Caldwell L. (eds.). Continuing Encounters between Past and Present, London, Routledge Publ., 2011, pp. 101–128.
  • 13. Le Corbusier. Towards a New Architecture. London, The Architectural Press Publ., 1974. 312 p.
  • 14. Lord Byron 1812–1818. Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage. Available at:–h/5131–h.htm (accessed 1 May 2019).
  • 15. Loukaki A. Greece: Ancient Ruinous Landscapes, Aesthetic Identity, and Issues of Development. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne, 2004, no. 30 (1), pp. 147–164.
  • 16. Loukaki A. Living Ruins, Value Conflicts. Aldershot, Ashgate; London, Routledge Publ., 2008–2016. 360 + x p.
  • 17. Loukaki A. The Geographical Unconscious. Aldershot, Ashgate; London, Routledge Publ., 2014–2016. 415 + xvi p.
  • 18. Loukaki A. Central Archaeological Domains of Athens and Rome: Physical, Metaphysical and Moral Aspects of their Respective Management. Moraitis K.; Rassia St. (eds.). Urban Ethics under Conditions of Crisis. Politics, Architecture, Landscape Sustainability and Multidisciplinary Engineering. Singapore, World Scientific Publ., 2019, pp. 81–114.
  • 19. Loukaki A. Introduction. Loukaki A. (ed.). Urban Art and the City. Creating, Destroying, and Reclaiming the Sublime. London, Routledge Publ., 2020.
  • 20. Loukaki A. Desacralized Eleusis. Contemplating the Impacts of Non-Restoration on a Major Classical and Poetic Locus. Athens University Review of Archaeology (AURA), forthcoming 1.
  • 21. Loukaki A. Art and National Consciousness: The Issue of Continuity and the Importance of Greek Permanencies. Loukaki A. (ed.) Art —Architecture — Urban Planning in Greek Antiquity. Patras, Hellenic Open University Publ., forthcoming 2.
  • 22. Loukaki A. The Italian Appropriation of the Roman Empire. Loukaki A. (ed.). Art —Architecture — Urban Planning in Greek Antiquity. Patras, Hellenic Open University Publ., forthcoming 3.
  • 23. Lyons C. L.; Papadopoulos J. K.; Stewart L. S.; Szegedy-Maszak A. Antiquity Photography —Early Views of Ancient Mediterranean Times. London, Thames & Hudson Publ., 2005. 246 p.
  • 24. Malnar J. M.; Vodvarka F. Sensory Design. Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press Publ., 2004. 376 p.
  • 25. Manacorda D. Archaeology and the Modern City: Thoughts on Rome (and Elsewhere). Caldwell D.; Caldwell L. (eds.). Rome — Continuing Encounters Between Past and Present. London, Routledge Publ., 2011, pp. 207–219.
  • 26. Matteini T. Paesaggi del Tempo: Documenti Archeologici e Rovine Artificiali nel Disegno. Florence, Alinea Publ., 2009. 176 p. (in Italian).
  • 27. Moullas P.; Mentzou V. Pages for Greece of the 20th Century: Texts of French Visitors. Athens, Olkos Publ., 1995. 350 p. (in Greek).
  • 28. Papageorgiou-Venetas A. The Garden of Amelia — Design, Foundation and Evolution of the National Garden of Athens. Athens, Ikaros Publ., 2007. 262 p. (in Greek).
  • 29. Pérez-Gómez A.; Pelletier L. Architectural Representation and the Perspective Hinge. Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press Publ., 1997. 526 p.
  • 30. Purcell N. The City of Rome. Jenkyns R. (ed.). The Legacy of Rome — A New Appraisal. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 1992, pp. 421–453.
  • 31. Purini F. Sette paesaggi / Seven Landscapes. Milan, Mondadori Electa Publ., 1989. 136 p.
  • 32. Rossi A. The Architecture of the City. Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press Publ., 1982. 208 p.
  • 33. Scully V. The Earth, the Temple and the Gods. New Haven, Connecticut, Yale University Press Publ., 1979. 303 p.
  • 34. Smith G.; Gadeyne J. (eds.). Perspectives on Public Space in Rome, from Antiquity to the Present Day. London, Routledge Publ., 2013. 434 p.
  • 35. Springer C. The Marble Wilderness: Ruins and Representation in Italian Romanticism, 1775–1850. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2010. 210 p.
  • 36. Wordsworth Ch. Athens — Attica — Journal of a Residence There. Athens, Hekate Publ., 1999. 296 p. (in Greek).