Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title Testimonies of the Future: The Digital-Turn in the Philosophy of Media and Hybrid Arts
Author email
About author Ryzhenkova, Valeria Vladimirovna — Ph. D. student. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation.
In the section Art Theory DOI10.18688/aa200-4-59
Year 2020 Volume 10 Pages 641648
Type of article RAR Index UDK 130.2 Index BBK 85c

The article provides an overview of several academic disciplines, such as the philosophy of media, theory of art, and visual studies for the analysis of transformation of visual knowledge and image in the digital era. The views of researchers are presented with attention to three largest traditions in the philosophy of media and visual studies — Anglo-Saxon, Russian, and German.

During the review, three basic theses are proposed:

1) digital ontologies are close to “flat ontologies” in basic principles of ontology, where the most important is modularity, which cannot be reduced to either hardware or software;

2) the influence of digital era is reflected in the hybrid art, as a result of incorporate high technology and art;

3) the result of digital revolution can be considered as the distinction between analog and digital media.

In this case, a new type of digital object (virtual) is understood as the difference between a copy and original work, a new variation of materiality.The prospects for further research on the role of digital objects and hybrid art are as follows:

— One of the tasks is a critical analysis of the ontology of a digital object with attention to image productionin the context of postmodern art studies and philosophy;

— The second task may be to study the works of new media with attention to the transformation of their institutional relationships, the role of Museum archives, and exhibition practices.

Reference Ryzhenkova, Valeria V. Testimonies of the Future: The Digital-Turn in the Philosophy of Media and Hybrid Arts. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of articles. Vol. 10. Ed: A. V. Zakharova, S. V. Maltseva, E. Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova. — Lomonosov Moscow State University / St. Petersburg: NP-Print, 2020, pp. 641–648. ISSN 2312-2129.
Publication Article language russian
  • Bolc N. Azbuka media (Das ABZ der Medien). Moscow, Europe Publ., 2011. 136 p. (in Russian).
  • Bruno G. Surface: Matters of Aesthetics, Materiality, and Media. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press Publ., 2014. 288 p.
  • Chubarov I.; Ryabova A. Media, Media Studies and Media Philosophy. Logos: web magazine on Philosophy, 2015, vol. 25, no. 2 (104), pp. 92–105. Available at:‑80.pdf (дата обращения 29.09.2018) (in Russian).
  • Delez Z.; Gvattari F. Tysiacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniia (A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia). Ekaterinburg, U-Faktoriya Publ.; Moscow, Astrel Publ., 2010. 895 p. (in Russian).
  • Drucker J. Art. Mitchell W. J. T.; Hansen M. (eds.). Critical Terms for Media Studies. Chicago; London, University of Chicago Press Publ., 2010, pp. 3–18.
  • Ernst W. Digital Memory and the Archive. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press Publ., 2013. 277 p.
  • Galloway A. R. Protocol. How Control Exist after Decentralization. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press Publ., 2004. 260 p.
  • Grau O. (ed.). MediaArtHistories. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press Publ., 2007. 488 p.
  • Kittler F. Opticheskie media. Berlinskie lektsii 1999 g. (Optical Media. Berlin Lectures 1999). Moscow, Logos Publ., 2009. 272 p. (in Russian).
  • Manovich L. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MIT Press Publ., 2001. 355 p.
  • Manovich L. Principles of New Media. Teorii soft-kul’tury (Theories of Soft-Culture). Nizhny Novgorod, Krasnaia lastochka Publ., 2017, pp. 16–32 (in Russian).
  • Manovich L. Postmedial Aesthetics. Teorii soft-kul’tury (Theories of Soft-Culture). Nizhny Novgorod, Krasnaia lastochka Publ., 2017, pp. 33–49 (in Russian).
  • McLuhan M. Galaktika Gutenberga. Stanovlenie cheloveka pechataiushchego (The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man). Kiev, Nika-Tsentr Publ., 2003. 432 p. (in Russian).
  • Mironov V. V. Semiotic Turns of Culture: From Dialogue to Monologue. Moscow State University Vestnik: Philosophy, 2017, no. 5, pp. 4–18 (in Russian).
  • Mitchell W. J. T.; Hansen Mark B. N. (eds.). Critical Terms for Media Studies. Chicago; London, The University of Chicago Press Publ., 2010. 353 p.
  • Paul Ch. (ed.). New Media in the White Cube and Beyond: Curatorial Models for Digital Art. California, University of California Press Publ., 2008. 273 p.
  • Paul Ch. Tsifrovoe iskusstvo (Digital Art). Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 2017. 272 p. (in Russian).
  • Shental A. Natural-Digital Chiasm. Moscow Art Magazine: web magazine on Art, 2015. Available at: (accessed 29 September 2018) (in Russian).
  • Venkova A. V. The Transgression of Media in the Philosophy of Diemar Kamper and the Critical Theory of Rosalind Krauss (on Dietmar Kamper’s Body. Violence. Pain and Rosalind E. Krauss’s Perpetual Inventory). International Journal of Cultural Research, 2010, no. 1, pp. 124–127 (in Russian).
  • Venkova A. V. Digital Immersive Environments in Art: New Anthropological Horizons. Zakharova A. V.; Maltseva S. V.; Staniukovich-Denisova E. Iu. (eds.). Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art: Collection of Articles, vol. 10. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University; St. Petersburg, NP-Print Publ., 2020 (in Russian).
  • Vetushinskiy A. S. “We Live in a Computer Game”: Metaphor of Video Game and Its Metaphysical Potential. Philosophical Thought: web magazine on Philosophy, 2017, no. 10, pp. 164–172. Available at:–8728.2017.10.24327 (accessed 05 October 2018) (in Russian).
  • Virilio P. Mashina zreniia (The Vision Machine). St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2004. 139 p. (in Russian).
  • Zielinski S. Deep Time of the Media. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press Publ., 2006. 375 p.